Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pitlane-ai/pitlane --skill testing-with-pitlanegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pitlane-ai/pitlaneWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pitlane-ai/pitlane/testing-with-pitlane)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pitlane-ai/pitlane/testing-with-pitlane"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pitlane-ai/pitlane/testing-with-pitlane/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pitlane-ai/pitlane/testing-with-pitlane"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pitlane-ai/pitlane/testing-with-pitlane.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.02661 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01331 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00532 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00266 |
Grade A, and why
testing-with-pitlane scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 239 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 990f01712c8b
testing-with-pitlane is a skill published in the GitHub repository pitlane-ai/pitlane (7 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 2,661 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
nemo-evaluator-sdk
Evaluates LLMs across 100+ benchmarks from 18+ harnesses (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, safety, VLM) with multi-backend execution. Use when needing scalable evaluation on local Docker, Slurm HPC, or cloud platforms. NVIDIA's enterprise-grade platform with container-first architecture for reproducible benchmarking.
create-custom-grader
Use when converting an existing benchmark, rubric, verifier, task YAML/JSON, or domain check into SkillEvaluator BYOG/BYOT custom evaluation.
local-test
Build, run, and test IronClaw locally using Docker containers and Chrome MCP browser automation.
qa-review
QA review for code changes — test coverage analysis, edge case identification, test plan generation, regression detection, test health tracking over time.
evaluating-llms-harness
Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.
rag-eval
NVIDIA RAG Blueprint evaluation guidance for measuring retrieval and answer quality with stable datasets, baselines, and reproducible scoring workflows.