Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PIXARTSeu/Synapse --skill systematic-debugginggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PIXARTSeu/SynapseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pixartseu/synapse/systematic-debugging)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pixartseu/synapse/systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pixartseu/synapse/systematic-debugging/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pixartseu/synapse/systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pixartseu/synapse/systematic-debugging.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.02675 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.01337 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00535 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00267 |
Grade A, and why
systematic-debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
13 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- condition-based-waiting-example.ts 4.9 KB runs code
- condition-based-waiting.md 3.4 KB
- CREATION-LOG.md 4.2 KB
- defense-in-depth.md 3.6 KB
- evals/evals.json 833 B
- evals/trigger_evals.json 597 B
- find-polluter.sh 1.5 KB runs code
- learnings.md 4.2 KB
- root-cause-tracing.md 5.2 KB
- test-academic.md 653 B
- test-pressure-1.md 1.9 KB
- test-pressure-2.md 2.2 KB
- test-pressure-3.md 2.6 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 338 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 16828b520eba
systematic-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository PIXARTSeu/Synapse (9 stars, last pushed 14d ago), with no licence file. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 2,675 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
om-troubleshooter
Diagnose and fix standalone Open Mercato bugs across scope, commands, locking, fields, generated registries, UI hydration, cache/search, bootstraps, queues, and providers. Use for "fix bug", "why does this fail", "regression", "debug", "napraw błąd", or a failing test.
memorix-troubleshooting
Use when Memorix MCP, setup, project binding, HTTP control plane, hooks, skills, or agent integration is missing, stale, or failing.
investigate
Systematic root-cause debugging: find the cause before writing any fix.
debug-systematic
Systematic 4-phase debugging methodology for complex, intermittent, or mysterious issues. Use when investigating bugs, race conditions, or unexplained failures.
cure
Apply selected fixes from an /age report, findings list, or CI failure. Run the project gates and hand a clean result to /plate. Use when the user wants selected findings resolved. Do not use for review, test authoring, or direct publication.
pasteurize
Diagnose and fix a hard bug. Build a reliable reproduction, name the cause, add a regression test, and apply the minimum fix. Use when the user reports a bug, a failure, a flaky test, a performance regression, an error, or a wrong result whose cause is unknown. Use when the user pastes a symptom, a stack trace, or…