Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agents --skill resilient-executiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/resilient-execution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/resilient-execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/resilient-execution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/resilient-execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/resilient-execution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.02321 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00928 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00464 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00232 |
Grade A, and why
resilient-execution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 250 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Overview
The resilient-execution skill prevents premature failure by enforcing a minimum of 3 genuinely different approaches before escalating to the user. It provides a structured error classification system, an approach cascade methodology, and transparent logging of each attempt. Without this skill, agents give up too early — with it, they systematically exhaust alternatives and only escalate with full evidence.
Announce at start: "I'm using the resilient-execution skill — I will try multiple approaches before escalating."
Phase 1: Error Classification
When an approach fails, immediately classify the error before retrying:
| Error Type | Definition | Indicators | Correct Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transient | Temporary infrastructure failure | Network timeout, rate limit, 503 error, lock contention | Wait briefly, retry the same approach |
| Environmental | Missing or misconfigured dependency | Module not found, wrong version, missing env var, permission denied | Fix the environment, then retry same approach |
| Logical | Wrong approach or incorrect assumption | Wrong output, unexpected behavior, type mismatch, wrong API usage | Rethink the approach entirely |
| Fundamental | Genuinely impossible with available tools | API does not exist, hardware limitation, missing capability | Escalate to user with evidence |
STOP: Classify the error before choosing your next approach. Wrong classification leads to wasted retries.
Phase 2: Approach Cascade
Execute the cascade systematically. Each attempt must be a genuinely different strategy.
Attempt 1: Primary approach (most direct solution)
| fails
v
Classify error -> Can same approach work with a fix?
| YES -> Fix and retry (does NOT count as a new attempt)
| NO -> Proceed to Attempt 2
v
Attempt 2: Alternative approach 1 (different technique)
| fails
v
Classify error -> Is this fundamentally blocked?
| YES -> Proceed directly to escalation
| NO -> Proceed to Attempt 3
v
Attempt 3: Alternative approach 2 (different path entirely)
| fails
v
Circuit breaker -> Present findings to user with full evidence
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 250 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 1ea48f972108
resilient-execution is a skill published in the GitHub repository Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agents (3 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 2,321 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
doubt-driven-development
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high…
performance-optimization
Optimizes application performance across frontend, backend, queries, and databases. Use when performance requirements exist, when you suspect performance regressions, when Core Web Vitals or load times need improvement, when N+1 query patterns need fixing, or when profiling reveals bottlenecks.
debugging-and-error-recovery
Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, something that worked yesterday broke, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need to figure out what broke and why — a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than…
systematic-debugging
A step-by-step method for finding the underlying cause of technical problems before changing code. It covers reading errors, reproducing failures, checking recent changes, and tracing data across system components.
diagnosing-superpowers
A diagnostic workflow for investigating problems in Superpowers agent sessions using saved conversation records. It requires evidence linked to exact file paths and line numbers, then organizes findings into a report.
browser-trace
Capture a full DevTools-protocol trace of any browser automation — CDP firehose, screenshots, and DOM dumps — then bisect the stream into per-page searchable buckets. Use when the user wants to debug a failed run, audit network/console/DOM activity, attach a trace to an in-progress session, or feed structured per-page…