Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agents --skill webapp-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/webapp-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/webapp-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/webapp-testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.02520 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01260 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00504 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00252 |
Grade A, and why
webapp-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 358 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Web App Testing
Overview
Comprehensive web application testing using Playwright as the primary tool. This skill covers end-to-end testing workflows including screenshot capture for visual verification, browser console log analysis, user interaction simulation, visual regression testing, accessibility auditing with axe-core, network request mocking, and mobile viewport testing.
Announce at start: "I'm using the webapp-testing skill for Playwright-based web application testing."
Phase 1: Test Planning
Goal: Identify what to test and set up the infrastructure.
Actions
- Identify critical user flows to test
- Define test environments and viewports
- Set up test fixtures and data
- Configure Playwright project settings
- Establish visual baseline screenshots
User Flow Priority Decision Table
| Flow Type | Priority | Test Depth |
|---|---|---|
| Authentication (login/logout/register) | Critical | Full happy + error paths |
| Core business workflow (purchase, submit) | Critical | Full happy + error + edge cases |
| Navigation and routing | High | All major routes |
| Search and filtering | High | Common queries + empty state |
| Settings and profile | Medium | Happy path |
| Admin/back-office | Medium | Key operations only |
STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 2 until:
- Critical user flows are identified and prioritized
- Test environments and viewports are defined
- Playwright config is ready
- Test data strategy is defined
Phase 2: Test Implementation
Goal: Write tests using page object models and accessible locators.
Actions
- Write page object models for key pages
- Implement end-to-end test scenarios
- Add visual regression snapshots
- Integrate accessibility checks
- Configure network mocking for isolated tests
Playwright Configuration
import { defineConfig, devices } from '@playwright/test';
export default defineConfig({
testDir: './tests/e2e',
fullyParallel: true,
forbidOnly: !!process.env.CI,
retries: process.env.CI ? 2 : 0,
workers: process.env.CI ? 1 : undefined,
reporter: [
['html', { open: 'never' }],
['junit', { outputFile: 'test-results/junit.xml' }],
],
use: {
baseURL: 'http://localhost:3000',
trace: 'on-first-retry',
screenshot: 'only-on-failure',
video: 'retain-on-failure',
},
projects: [
{ name: 'chromium', use: { ...devices['Desktop Chrome'] } },
{ name: 'firefox', use: { ...devices['Desktop Firefox'] } },
{ name: 'webkit', use: { ...devices['Desktop Safari'] } },
{ name: 'mobile-chrome', use: { ...devices['Pixel 5'] } },
{ name: 'mobile-safari', use: { ...devices['iPhone 13'] } },
],
webServer: {
command: 'npm run dev',
url: 'http://localhost:3000',
reuseExistingServer: !process.env.CI,
},
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 358 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 395a7f46afe8
webapp-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agents (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 2,520 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
browser-testing-with-devtools
Tests in real browsers via Chrome DevTools MCP. Use when building or debugging anything that runs in a browser. Use when you need to inspect the DOM, capture console errors, analyze network requests, profile performance, or verify visual output with real runtime data. Requires the chrome-devtools MCP server to be…
qa-loop
Runs an interactive localhost QA session that accepts issues, screenshots, routes, and browser evidence; watches app, API, browser, and network errors; reproduces and fixes each defect; verifies the result; and creates one local commit per fix. Use when asked to start QA, QA a local app, fix localhost issues as they…
agent-browser
Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.
browser-testing-with-devtools
A guide for testing web pages and browser-based applications in a real Chrome browser through Chrome DevTools. It checks what is actually rendered and how the page behaves at runtime.
browser-testing-with-devtools
Tests in real browsers via Chrome DevTools MCP. Use when building or debugging anything that runs in a browser. Use when you need to inspect the DOM, capture console errors, analyze network requests, profile performance, or verify visual output with real runtime data. Requires the chrome-devtools MCP server to be…
e2e-testing-patterns
Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.