Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/piyush8296/claude-workspace/systematic-debuggingnpx skills add Piyush8296/claude-workspace --skill systematic-debugginggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Piyush8296/claude-workspaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/piyush8296/claude-workspace/systematic-debugging)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/piyush8296/claude-workspace/systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/piyush8296/claude-workspace/systematic-debugging.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01288 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00644 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00258 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
systematic-debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Systematic Debugging
Core Principle
NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST.
Never apply symptom-focused patches that mask underlying problems. Understand WHY something fails before writing a single line of fix code.
The Four-Phase Framework
Phase 1: Reproduce & Gather Evidence
Before touching any code:
- Read the full error — every word matters, including the stack trace
- Reproduce consistently — define exact steps. If you can't reproduce, you can't verify a fix
- Check recent changes —
git log --oneline -10, what changed before this broke? - Gather diagnostics — console output, network tab, React DevTools, state snapshots
- Define expected vs actual — write it down explicitly
# Find the breaking change
git log --oneline -20
git bisect start
git bisect bad HEAD
git bisect good <last-known-good-commit>
Phase 2: Trace to Root Cause
Follow the data, not your assumptions:
1. Where does the error appear? (symptom location)
2. What value is wrong at that point?
3. Where does that value come from? (trace upstream)
4. Is the value wrong at the source, or corrupted in transit?
5. What assumption was violated?
Key insight: The bug is rarely where the error appears. Trace upstream until you find where correct data becomes incorrect.
Phase 3: Hypothesize & Test
Scientific method, not shotgun debugging:
- One clear hypothesis — "The error occurs because X causes Y"
- Predict the outcome — "If my hypothesis is correct, then Z should happen when I..."
- Change ONE variable — isolate the test
- Observe result — did it match prediction?
- Iterate or proceed — revise hypothesis if wrong, implement if right
Phase 4: Fix & Verify
- Write a failing test that captures the exact bug
- Implement the fix — address root cause, not symptoms
- Verify the test passes
- Run full test suite — no regressions
- Verify in browser — test the actual user flow
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 177 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 7d2b91ab2ce0
systematic-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository Piyush8296/claude-workspace (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,288 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
rspec
This skill should be used when the user asks to "write specs", "create spec", "add RSpec tests", "fix failing spec", or mentions RSpec, describe blocks, it blocks, expect syntax, test doubles, or matchers. Should also be used when editing spec.rb files, working in spec/ directory, planning implementation phases that…
activerecord
This skill should be used when the user asks to "write a migration", "add a column", "add column to table", "create an index", "add a foreign key", "set up associations", "fix N+1 queries", "optimize queries", "add validations", "create callbacks", "use eager loading", or mentions ActiveRecord, belongsto, hasmany…
draper-decorators
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a decorator", "write a decorator", "move logic into decorator", "clean logic out of the view", "isn't it decorator logic", "test a decorator", or mentions Draper, keeping views clean, or representation logic in decorators. Should also be used when editing…
mcp-server
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an MCP server", "build MCP tools", "define MCP prompts", "register MCP resources", "implement Model Context Protocol", or mentions the mcp gem, MCP::Server, MCP::Tool, JSON-RPC transport, stdio transport, or streamable HTTP transport. Should also be used when…
ratatui-ruby
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a TUI", "terminal interface", "terminal UI", "ratatui", "ratatui-ruby", "inline viewport", "full-screen terminal app", "terminal widgets", "tui.draw", "tui.pollevent", or mentions RatatuiRuby.run, managed loop, terminal rendering, Tea MVU, or building CLI…
dragonruby
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a game", "make a game", "game development", "dragonruby", "drgtk", "game loop", "tick method", "sprite rendering", "game state", or mentions args.outputs, args.state, args.inputs, coordinate system, collision detection, animation frames, or scene management.…