claude-workspace: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md

systematic-debugging is a skill for Claude Code from Piyush8296/claude-workspace. It costs 44 tokens per session (1,288 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A four-phase method for debugging software by reproducing the problem, gathering evidence, tracing its root cause, and then applying and checking a fix.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to investigate bugs, failed tests, unexpected behavior, and production problems in a structured order.
Why use it?
It reduces symptom-based patches that hide the real cause of a bug or test failure.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is Piyush8296/claude-workspace's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on claude-workspace itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything claude-workspace configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to Piyush8296/claude-workspace. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Piyush8296/claude-workspace/main/.claude/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Piyush8296/claude-workspace

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for systematic-debugging

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/piyush8296/claude-workspace/systematic-debugging/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/piyush8296/claude-workspace/systematic-debugging)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/piyush8296/claude-workspace/systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/piyush8296/claude-workspace/systematic-debugging/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for systematic-debugging

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/piyush8296/claude-workspace/systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/piyush8296/claude-workspace/systematic-debugging.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 44 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,288 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00044 $0.01288
Opus 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00515
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00258
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00129

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 7d2b91ab2ce0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

systematic-debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md · 177 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Systematic Debugging

Core Principle

NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST.

Never apply symptom-focused patches that mask underlying problems. Understand WHY something fails before writing a single line of fix code.

The Four-Phase Framework

Phase 1: Reproduce & Gather Evidence

Before touching any code:

  1. Read the full error — every word matters, including the stack trace
  2. Reproduce consistently — define exact steps. If you can't reproduce, you can't verify a fix
  3. Check recent changes — git log --oneline -10, what changed before this broke?
  4. Gather diagnostics — console output, network tab, React DevTools, state snapshots
  5. Define expected vs actual — write it down explicitly
# Find the breaking change
git log --oneline -20
git bisect start
git bisect bad HEAD
git bisect good <last-known-good-commit>

Phase 2: Trace to Root Cause

Follow the data, not your assumptions:

1. Where does the error appear? (symptom location)
2. What value is wrong at that point?
3. Where does that value come from? (trace upstream)
4. Is the value wrong at the source, or corrupted in transit?
5. What assumption was violated?

Key insight: The bug is rarely where the error appears. Trace upstream until you find where correct data becomes incorrect.

Phase 3: Hypothesize & Test

Scientific method, not shotgun debugging:

  1. One clear hypothesis — "The error occurs because X causes Y"
  2. Predict the outcome — "If my hypothesis is correct, then Z should happen when I..."
  3. Change ONE variable — isolate the test
  4. Observe result — did it match prediction?
  5. Iterate or proceed — revise hypothesis if wrong, implement if right

Phase 4: Fix & Verify

  1. Write a failing test that captures the exact bug
  2. Implement the fix — address root cause, not symptoms
  3. Verify the test passes
  4. Run full test suite — no regressions
  5. Verify in browser — test the actual user flow

Read the full file on GitHub · 177 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 177 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 7d2b91ab2ce0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

systematic-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository Piyush8296/claude-workspace (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,288 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

monitoring-observability

OpenTelemetry, structured logging, distributed tracing, alerting, and dashboards. Use when instrumenting services, designing logs/traces/metrics, defining SLOs and alerts, or debugging production behavior from telemetry.

travisjneuman/.claude · 48 tokens

thinking-scientific-method

When a symptom has several plausible causes, rank falsifiable hypotheses and run the cheapest discriminating observation first; prefer least-assumptive survivors only after evidence fit.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills · 38 tokens

debug-systematic

Systematic 4-phase debugging methodology for complex, intermittent, or mysterious issues. Use when investigating bugs, race conditions, or unexplained failures.

travisjneuman/.claude · 33 tokens

thinking-five-whys-plus

When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills · 41 tokens

thinking-map-territory

When a claim, doc, test, metric, or assumption conflicts with observed behavior, stop theorizing from the map and verify the live code or data; let territory overrule.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills · 42 tokens

windows-ops

Comprehensive Windows workstation operations - diagnose slow boot, failing drives, BSOD crashes, startup bloat, runaway processes, event logs. Use for: Windows is slow, slow bootup, won't boot, blue screen, BSOD, kernel crash, drive failing, SMART errors, disk errors, Event 41, Event 129, storahci reset, BugCheck…

0xDarkMatter/claude-mods · 233 tokens