Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac --skill design-compliance-architecturegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pjt222/agent-almanac/design-compliance-architecture)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pjt222/agent-almanac/design-compliance-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pjt222/agent-almanac/design-compliance-architecture/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pjt222/agent-almanac/design-compliance-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pjt222/agent-almanac/design-compliance-architecture.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.03117 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.01558 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00623 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00312 |
Grade A, and why
design-compliance-architecture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 276 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Design Compliance Architecture
Establish the top-level compliance framework that maps regulations to systems, classifies criticality, and defines governance for a regulated environment.
When to Use
- A new regulated facility, department, or programme is being established
- An existing organisation needs to formalise its compliance posture across multiple systems
- A regulatory gap analysis reveals missing system classification or validation strategy
- Mergers, acquisitions, or reorganisations require harmonising compliance across entities
- Preparing a site master file or quality manual that references computerized systems
Inputs
- Required: List of computerized systems in scope (name, purpose, vendor/custom)
- Required: Applicable regulatory frameworks (21 CFR Part 11, EU Annex 11, GMP, GLP, GCP, ICH Q7, ICH Q10)
- Required: Organisational context (department, site, product types)
- Optional: Existing validation master plan or quality manual
- Optional: Previous audit findings or regulatory inspection observations
- Optional: Organisational chart with quality and IT reporting lines
Procedure
Step 1: Build the System Inventory
Create a comprehensive inventory of all computerized systems:
# System Inventory
## Document ID: SI-[SITE]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
| ID | System Name | Version | Vendor | Purpose | Department | Data Types | Users |
|----|-------------|---------|--------|---------|------------|------------|-------|
| SYS-001 | LabWare LIMS | 8.1 | LabWare Inc. | Sample management and testing | QC | Test results, COA | 45 |
| SYS-002 | SAP ERP | S/4HANA | SAP SE | Batch release and inventory | Production | Batch records, BOM | 120 |
| SYS-003 | Custom R/Shiny | 2.1.0 | Internal | Statistical analysis | Biostatistics | Clinical data | 8 |
| SYS-004 | Windows Server | 2022 | Microsoft | File server | IT | Documents | 200 |
Got: Every system that creates, modifies, stores, retrieves, or transmits GxP-relevant data is listed. If fail: If system owners cannot provide complete information, document the gap and schedule a discovery workshop. Missing systems are a critical compliance risk.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 276 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 39c655086e8f
design-compliance-architecture is a skill published in the GitHub repository pjt222/agent-almanac (33 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 3,117 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
crisis-holding
Draft crisis holding statements, journalist Q&A posture, and what-not-to-say guidance from confirmed incident facts, with a hard legal-counsel gate. Builds each statement through proven crisis-comms frameworks (holding-statement anatomy, SCCT, CAP order, the legitimate non-answer, bridge/flag/block).
cocoaudit
View and export the append-only session audit trail for regulated environments.
audit-add
Add a clearly marked manual CocoAudit event. Usage: $audit add " ".
audit-timeline
Render CocoAudit records as a compact chronological timeline. Usage: $audit timeline.
analytics
Queries local analytics across OrchestKit projects for agent usage, skill frequency, hook timing, team activity, session replay, cost estimation, and model delegation trends. Privacy-safe with hashed project IDs. Supports time-range filtering and comparative analysis. Use when reviewing performance, estimating costs…
audit-export
Export the full CocoAudit trail as a stakeholder-ready compliance document.