Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PlamenTSV/plamen --skill ability-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PlamenTSV/plamenWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/plamentsv/plamen/ability-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plamentsv/plamen/ability-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plamentsv/plamen/ability-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plamentsv/plamen/ability-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plamentsv/plamen/ability-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.03111 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01244 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00622 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00311 |
Grade A, and why
ability-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 247 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ABILITY_ANALYSIS Skill
Trigger Pattern: Always (Aptos Move) --- foundational security check Inject Into: Breadth agents, depth agents
For every struct defined in the audited modules:
STEP PRIORITY: Steps 2 (Copy Ability Audit) and 6 (Ability Combination Analysis) are where HIGH/CRITICAL severity findings most commonly hide. Do NOT rush these steps. If constrained, skip conditional sections (7) before skipping 2 or 6.
1. Struct Ability Inventory
Enumerate ALL structs defined in the audited modules:
| Struct | Module | Abilities | Represents Value? | Represents Obligation? | Is Resource? | Security Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {name} | {module} | copy, drop, store, key | YES/NO | YES/NO | YES/NO | {assessment} |
Classification guide:
- Value-bearing: Coins, LP tokens, shares, receipts, vouchers, NFTs --- anything that represents transferable economic value or a claim to value
- Obligation-bearing: Hot potatoes, flash loan receipts, callback obligations, lock receipts --- anything that MUST be consumed before transaction ends
- Resource: Singleton state containers, registries, configuration stores --- things that should exist at most once per address/globally
- Data: Purely informational structs with no security-sensitive lifecycle (events, parameters, intermediate computation results)
For each struct: What abilities does it NEED vs what abilities does it HAVE? Excess abilities are the attack surface.
2. Copy Ability Audit
For each struct with the copy ability:
2a. Value Duplication Check
| Struct | Has copy? |
Represents Value? | Duplication Exploitable? | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {name} | YES/NO | YES/NO | YES/NO --- {reason} | {H/M/L/N/A} |
CRITICAL: copy on a value-bearing type means the value can be duplicated at zero cost. This is the Move equivalent of a double-spend.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 247 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 561afa06076d
ability-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository PlamenTSV/plamen (309 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 3,111 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
prowler-tour
Keeps product-tour definitions aligned with the UI features they describe. Trigger: When modifying UI components that have associated tours, editing tour definition files, or renaming data-tour-id attributes.
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
Perform static and symbolic analysis of Solidity smart contracts using Slither and Mythril to detect reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, and other vulnerability classes before deployment to Ethereum mainnet.
trading-solana
Trade tokens on Solana DEXes - Jupiter, Raydium, Orca, Meteora, Pump.fun.
public
For agents: This document explains how to integrate with Clodds APIs.
pumpfun
Pump.fun - Complete Solana memecoin launchpad. Discovery, trending, gainers, losers, token data all work without a key. Trading requires SOLANAPRIVATEKEY.
bags
Bags.fm - Complete Solana token launchpad with creator monetization.