ability-analysis

ability-analysis is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from PlamenTSV/plamen. It costs 25 tokens per session (3,111 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A security-review checklist for Aptos Move smart contracts, which are programs that manage digital assets on the Aptos blockchain. It checks each data structure’s permissions and how combinations of permissions may affect safety.

In plain words
What is it for?
Auditing Move modules for security issues in asset handling, obligations such as flash-loan receipts, and singleton registries or configuration records. It is intended to run as a foundational check during broad and detailed audits.
Why use it?
Move permissions control whether data can be copied, discarded, stored, or used as account-owned resources. Reviewing them systematically helps uncover flaws involving valuable assets, one-time obligations, or state that should exist only once.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/plamentsv/plamen/ability-analysis
Any agent
npx skills add PlamenTSV/plamen --skill ability-analysis
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PlamenTSV/plamen

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ability-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plamentsv/plamen/ability-analysis.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/plamentsv/plamen/ability-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plamentsv/plamen/ability-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plamentsv/plamen/ability-analysis.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 25 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,111 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00025 $0.03111
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.01555
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00622
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00311

Measured 3d ago against content hash 561afa06076d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ability-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/skills/aptos/ability-analysis/SKILL.md · 247 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 247 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

ABILITY_ANALYSIS Skill

Trigger Pattern: Always (Aptos Move) --- foundational security check Inject Into: Breadth agents, depth agents

For every struct defined in the audited modules:

STEP PRIORITY: Steps 2 (Copy Ability Audit) and 6 (Ability Combination Analysis) are where HIGH/CRITICAL severity findings most commonly hide. Do NOT rush these steps. If constrained, skip conditional sections (7) before skipping 2 or 6.

1. Struct Ability Inventory

Enumerate ALL structs defined in the audited modules:

Struct Module Abilities Represents Value? Represents Obligation? Is Resource? Security Assessment
{name} {module} copy, drop, store, key YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO {assessment}

Classification guide:

  • Value-bearing: Coins, LP tokens, shares, receipts, vouchers, NFTs --- anything that represents transferable economic value or a claim to value
  • Obligation-bearing: Hot potatoes, flash loan receipts, callback obligations, lock receipts --- anything that MUST be consumed before transaction ends
  • Resource: Singleton state containers, registries, configuration stores --- things that should exist at most once per address/globally
  • Data: Purely informational structs with no security-sensitive lifecycle (events, parameters, intermediate computation results)

For each struct: What abilities does it NEED vs what abilities does it HAVE? Excess abilities are the attack surface.

2. Copy Ability Audit

For each struct with the copy ability:

2a. Value Duplication Check

Struct Has copy? Represents Value? Duplication Exploitable? Severity
{name} YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO --- {reason} {H/M/L/N/A}

CRITICAL: copy on a value-bearing type means the value can be duplicated at zero cost. This is the Move equivalent of a double-spend.

Read the full file on GitHub · 247 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 247 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 561afa06076d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ability-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository PlamenTSV/plamen (281 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 3,111 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

prowler-ui

Prowler UI-specific patterns. For generic patterns, see: typescript, react-19, nextjs-16, tailwind-4. Trigger: When working inside ui/ on Prowler-specific conventions (shadcn, folder placement, actions/adapters, shared types/hooks/lib).

prowler-cloud/prowler · 64 tokens

prowler-pr

Creates Pull Requests for Prowler following the project template and conventions. Trigger: When working on pull request requirements or creation (PR template sections, PR title Conventional Commits check, changelog gate/no-changelog label), or when inspecting PR-related GitHub workflows like conventional-commit.yml…

prowler-cloud/prowler · 84 tokens

prowler-test-api

Testing patterns for Prowler API: JSON:API, Celery tasks, RLS isolation, RBAC. Trigger: When writing tests for api/ (JSON:API requests/assertions, cross-tenant isolation, RBAC, Celery tasks, viewsets/serializers).

prowler-cloud/prowler · 62 tokens

tailwind-4

Tailwind CSS 4 patterns and best practices. Trigger: When styling with Tailwind (className, variants, cn()), especially when dynamic styling or CSS variables are involved (no var() in className).

prowler-cloud/prowler · 47 tokens

prowler-commit

Creates professional git commits following conventional-commits format. Trigger: When creating commits, after completing code changes, when user asks to commit.

prowler-cloud/prowler · 33 tokens

react-19

React 19 patterns with React Compiler. Trigger: When writing React 19 components/hooks in .tsx (React Compiler rules, hook patterns, refs as props). If using Next.js App Router/Server Actions, also use nextjs-16.

prowler-cloud/prowler · 53 tokens