Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/plamentsv/plamen/type-safetynpx skills add PlamenTSV/plamen --skill type-safetygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PlamenTSV/plamenWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/plamentsv/plamen/type-safety)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plamentsv/plamen/type-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plamentsv/plamen/type-safety.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.03512 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01756 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00702 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00351 |
Grade A, and why
type-safety scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 269 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TYPE_SAFETY Skill
Trigger Pattern: Always (Aptos Move) --- generic type exploitation Inject Into: Breadth agents, depth-state-trace
Move's type system is its primary security mechanism. Generic type parameters allow modules to be polymorphic, but incorrect or insufficient type constraints enable attackers to substitute unexpected types, bypass access control, confuse token types, or exploit phantom type assumptions. This skill audits every generic interface for type safety violations.
STEP PRIORITY: Steps 2 (Type Parameter Substitution) and 5 (Coin/FungibleAsset Type Confusion) are where HIGH/CRITICAL severity findings most commonly hide. Do NOT rush these steps. If constrained, skip conditional sections (3, 4) before skipping 2 or 5.
1. Generic Function Inventory
Enumerate ALL public, public(friend), and entry functions with generic type parameters:
| Function | Module | Type Params | Constraints | Visibility | Entry? | Who Can Call |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
withdraw<T> |
vault | T | key |
public | YES | Any signer |
swap<X, Y> |
dex | X, Y | store |
public | YES | Any signer |
MANDATORY GREP: Search all .move files for fun .*< to find every generic function. Include internal (fun), public(friend) fun, public fun, and public entry fun.
For each generic function, additionally note:
- Does the function create, destroy, or transfer instances of the generic type?
- Does the function make assumptions about the generic type beyond its constraints? (e.g., assuming T is a coin type when the constraint is only
store) - Is the generic parameter used as a phantom/tag or does the function operate on actual instances of T?
2. Type Parameter Substitution Analysis
For each generic function identified in Step 1, analyze what happens when an attacker substitutes an unexpected type:
2a. Substitution Attack Table
| Function | Type Param | Expected Type | Attacker Substitutes | Guard Against Wrong Type? | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
withdraw<T>(store) |
T | RealCoin | FakeCoin (attacker-defined) | YES --- {mechanism} / NO | {impact} |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 269 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A edf61b1cda9f
type-safety is a skill published in the GitHub repository PlamenTSV/plamen (281 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 3,512 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
Perform static and symbolic analysis of Solidity smart contracts using Slither and Mythril to detect reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, and other vulnerability classes before deployment to Ethereum mainnet.
prowler-tour
Keeps product-tour definitions aligned with the UI features they describe. Trigger: When modifying UI components that have associated tours, editing tour definition files, or renaming data-tour-id attributes.
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
Perform static and symbolic analysis of Solidity smart contracts using Slither and Mythril to detect reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, and other vulnerability classes before deployment to Ethereum mainnet.
evm-bytecode-analysis
Analyze supplied deployed EVM runtime bytecode with EVMole or guide a separate application in integrating a published EVMole Rust, Go, Python, or JavaScript binding. Use for unverified-contract inspection, ABI reconstruction from runtime code, selector discovery, storage-access analysis, EVM control-flow inspection…
verify-deployment-pr
Verifies a POST-EXECUTION mainnet (or other network) smart-contract deployment PR for this repo: confirms every deployed contract is listed in the PR description, that the on-chain verified source (and its dependencies) matches the codebase via sol2uml diff, that constructor args and the initialize tx match the…
talos-action-development
Develop, modify, review, and maintain standalone Talos actions in contracts/tasks/actions, including chain guardrails, contract bindings, transaction safety, schedules, action catalogues, and Talos documentation. Use when adding an action, changing an action’s behavior or parameters, updating a Talos schedule, or…