Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pleaseai/claude-code-plugins --skill recipe-review-meet-participantsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pleaseai/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/recipe-review-meet-participants)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/recipe-review-meet-participants"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/recipe-review-meet-participants/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/recipe-review-meet-participants"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pleaseai/claude-code-plugins/recipe-review-meet-participants.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00211 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00105 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
recipe-review-meet-participants scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to recipe-review-meet-participants — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Review Google Meet Attendance
PREREQUISITE: Load the following skills to execute this recipe:
gws-meet
Review who attended a Google Meet conference and for how long.
Steps
- List recent conferences:
gws meet conferenceRecords list --format table - List participants:
gws meet conferenceRecords participants list --params '{"parent": "conferenceRecords/CONFERENCE_ID"}' --format table - Get session details:
gws meet conferenceRecords participants participantSessions list --params '{"parent": "conferenceRecords/CONFERENCE_ID/participants/PARTICIPANT_ID"}' --format table
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 28 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 1a0b1b97719a
recipe-review-meet-participants is a skill published in the GitHub repository pleaseai/claude-code-plugins (14 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 211 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to recipe-review-meet-participants, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…