Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to plipowczan/claude-piv-skeleton. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/plipowczan/claude-piv-skeleton/main/.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/plipowczan/claude-piv-skeletonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/plipowczan/claude-piv-skeleton/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plipowczan/claude-piv-skeleton/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plipowczan/claude-piv-skeleton/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plipowczan/claude-piv-skeleton/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plipowczan/claude-piv-skeleton/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00094 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00047 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00019 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Skill
Checks:
- TDD compliance
- Coverage ≥80%
- Security (OWASP)
- Conventions
- Error handling
- DRY principle
Read .claude/reference/skills-full/code-review-full.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 18 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 33ff012939de
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository plipowczan/claude-piv-skeleton (4 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 94 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
orchestrated-execution
Execute work units through the rigorous 4-phase Metaswarm cycle (Implement -> Validate -> Adversarial Review -> Commit) with independent quality gate enforcement.
gentle-ai
Use Gentle AI harness discipline for Pi work: clarify first, preserve OpenSpec artifacts, use strict TDD where available, delegate through subagents when useful, and protect review workload.
software-test-review
Evaluate the quality of TDD tests against slice acceptance criteria, codebase conventions, and Red-phase execution results, producing a structured review with Accept or Revise recommendations. Use when tests written during the Red phase of red-green-refactor need quality review — checking coverage of acceptance…
software-code-refactoring
Improve production code quality while preserving all existing test behavior. Commonly used for the Refactor phase of TDD red-green-refactor, but applicable to any codebase with tests. Use when production code works but needs cleanup — reducing duplication, improving naming, simplifying complexity, aligning with…
quality-playbook
Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches.…
superpowers-zh
Use when constraining AI coding with Chinese TDD methodology, systematic debugging, code review, and verification workflows. Superpowers-zh: Chinese adaptation of the Superpowers AI-assisted programming skills and methodologies.