redesign

redesign is a skill for Claude Code from plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills. It costs 60 tokens per session (687 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A method for improving an existing website or app while keeping its current functions working. It reviews the design, spots repetitive or machine-made visual patterns, and applies targeted changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit, polish, modernize, or improve an existing UI or codebase.
Why use it?
It helps modernize an interface without starting over or accidentally removing useful behavior.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions Claude Code.

Part of the ux-ui-agent-skills plugin — 26 skills, 1 command, 1 agent, 3 hooks, 2 MCP servers shipped together

Good fit Use it to audit, polish, modernize, or improve an existing UI or codebase.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills/redesign
About the project

UX/UI Agent Skills is a set of instructions, design tokens, reusable components, accessibility rules, and design-system references that guide Claude in producing interface designs and code. It is intended for developers and designers who want framework-independent, token-based UI work with accessibility checks. The catalogue entries package these UX, UI, component, and validation workflows as Claude Code skills and related add-ons.

plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills · 3,006 stars · on GitHub · plugin87.github.io

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills --skill redesign
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ux-ui-agent-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 26 skills, 1 command, 1 agent, 3 hooks, 2 MCP servers.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for redesign

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills/redesign/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills/redesign)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills/redesign"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills/redesign/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for redesign

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills/redesign"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills/redesign.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 60 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 687 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • Socket pass 6 Oct 2026
  • Snyk pass 7 Oct 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00060 $0.00687
Opus 5.5 $0.00024 $0.00275
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00137
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00069

Measured today against content hash cfd5c01af2d8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

redesign scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/redesign/SKILL.md · 34 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 34 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Skill: Redesign & Audit

Step 0: is the kit here? This skill reads files from the kit. Check once: ls ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../tokens >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo KIT_OK || echo KIT_MISSING On KIT_MISSING only the skill folders were installed, which is what npx skills add does. Say so plainly, point the user at npx ux-ui-agent-skills init or the plugin install, and stop. Do not guess the contents of a file you could not open.

Audit-first redesign that preserves behavior.

Steps

  1. Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../workflows/redesign-audit.md (the full Scan → Diagnose → Direct → Apply → Verify sequence + Output Completeness).
  2. Scan the codebase: framework, styling method (→ route to the matching ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../frameworks/ adapter), token reality, components, what must be preserved.
  3. Diagnose with the Banned Defaults checklist (${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../taste/design-taste.md) + the review rubric (design-review skill). Produce a prioritized findings table.
  4. Direct: choose an archetype/system (apply-aesthetic skill) that fits the brand.
  5. Apply in order (tokens first, then typography/spacing, then component states, then motion) without changing routes/data/markup semantics (except a11y fixes).
  6. Verify: re-run design-review + a11y-audit; smoke-test every previously working flow; dark mode + responsive spot-check. Run ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../scripts/validate_contrast.py on the token source and ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../scripts/lint_hardcodes.py over the changed code.

Guardrails

Never sacrifice a working feature for aesthetics. Never ship a brand color that fails contrast. Never remove existing accessibility affordances. Deliver complete files, no placeholders.

Single-theme consistency (critical for multi-page apps)

Consolidate to ONE shared token theme and make every page consume it. A redesign that leaves different pages on different palettes has failed. Replace per-page/ad-hoc colors with semantic tokens; verify with ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../scripts/lint_hardcodes.py that no page reintroduces off-theme values. Theme switches must come from the single token source, not page edits (${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../.claude/rules/tokens-and-color.md → Single-Theme Consistency).

Read the full file on GitHub · 34 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today Changed cfd5c01af2d8
  2. 19d ago Changed · +10 lines a19db6d67bab
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A c65769cc9084

Subscribe to this mod's changes

redesign is a skill published in the GitHub repository plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills (3,006 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 687 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.