UX/UI Agent Skills is a set of instructions, design tokens, reusable components, accessibility rules, and design-system references that guide Claude in producing interface designs and code. It is intended for developers and designers who want framework-independent, token-based UI work with accessibility checks. The catalogue entries package these UX, UI, component, and validation workflows as Claude Code skills and related add-ons.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills --skill shipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills/ship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills/ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills/ship/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills/ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills/ship.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00531 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00212 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
ship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Step 0 — is the kit here? This skill reads files from the kit. Check once:
ls ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../tokens >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo KIT_OK || echo KIT_MISSINGOnKIT_MISSINGonly the skill folders were installed, which is whatnpx skills adddoes. Say so plainly, point the user atnpx ux-ui-agent-skills initor the plugin install, and stop. Do not guess the contents of a file you could not open.
Gate first, then prepare the release. Do nothing destructive without explicit confirmation (no tag, no publish) — this command verifies and drafts only.
-
Quality gate (must be fully green before continuing):
node ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../scripts/accuracy_report.mjs— report the real N/N.node ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../scripts/verify_responsive.mjs examples— no overflow at 280/320/414.python3 ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../scripts/check_no_emoji.py— UI + taste + instruction surface. If anything fails, stop and fix; do not proceed to the checklist.
-
Release checklist (per the project release rule):
- Update
README.md: version badge, "current" line, and changelog entry. - Confirm the bump level (major/minor/patch) with the user — it is their call.
- Confirm
examples/apple-homestays gitignored (local IP). - List the commits since the last tag so the changelog is accurate.
- Update
-
Output a ready-to-review summary: the green N/N line, the proposed version, and the drafted changelog entry. Wait for the user to approve before any
git tag/ publish step.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 36 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A b0cdad9a1c9e
ship is a skill published in the GitHub repository plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills (2,012 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 531 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
multi-version-behavior-comparator
Compare behavior across multiple versions of programs or repositories. Use when you need to analyze how functionality changes between versions, identify regressions, compare outputs and exceptions, or validate upgrades. The skill compares execution behavior, test results, outputs, exceptions, and observable states…
done
End-of-session shipping gate — "prove it works, then ship it." Runs an evidence checklist (full test suite, lint/typecheck, build, and actually running the change — output quoted, never asserted), then a fresh-context two-stage review by a sub-agent that sees only the diff and the spec: spec-compliance first…
production-build-verification
Build the standalone Forge artifact with strict routing inputs and confirm its static output exists.
dev-ship
Fechamento de feature — verificação goal-backward antes de declarar pronto. Roda Must-Haves do PLAN.md, executa o demo script, revisa o diff completo procurando bugs e restos (debug logs, TODOs, código morto), passa lente de segurança nos arquivos tocados, escreve SUMMARY.md e arquiva o plano. Use quando o usuário…
release-checklist
Generates a comprehensive pre-release validation checklist for software versions covering build verification, deployment readiness, and release risk. Use when preparing to release a product version or when the user mentions release checklist or pre-release validation.
release-readiness
The go/no-go gate before shipping — a structured launch checklist across security, data, legal, operations, performance, accessibility and rollback, producing an explicit ship or do-not-ship decision with named blockers. Use when the user says "ready to launch", "go live", "ship it", "pre-launch", "launch checklist"…