analyzing-indicators-of-compromise

analyzing-indicators-of-compromise is a skill for Claude Code from plurigrid/asi. It costs 106 tokens per session (1,650 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of analyzing-indicators-of-compromise, MIT.

A guide to investigating indicators of compromise, such as suspicious IP addresses, domains, URLs, file hashes, and email artifacts. It organizes these clues and checks their reputation and links to known attacks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to triage single or bulk indicators, enrich them with threat-intelligence sources, estimate confidence, connect them to campaigns, and prioritize blocking.
Why use it?
It helps analysts decide which raw clues from phishing messages or security alerts deserve attention. It adds context before an indicator is sent to blocking systems, where shared cloud or CDN infrastructure can cause mistakes.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the asi plugin — 56 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to triage single or bulk indicators, enrich them with threat-intelligence sources, estimate confidence, connect them to campaigns, and prioritize blocking.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/plurigrid/asi/analyzing-indicators-of-compromise
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add plurigrid/asi --skill analyzing-indicators-of-compromise
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/plurigrid/asi

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install asi, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 56 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analyzing-indicators-of-compromise

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plurigrid/asi/analyzing-indicators-of-compromise/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/plurigrid/asi/analyzing-indicators-of-compromise)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plurigrid/asi/analyzing-indicators-of-compromise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plurigrid/asi/analyzing-indicators-of-compromise/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for analyzing-indicators-of-compromise

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plurigrid/asi/analyzing-indicators-of-compromise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plurigrid/asi/analyzing-indicators-of-compromise.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 106 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,650 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 2 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 84% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00106 $0.01650
Opus 5 $0.00053 $0.00825
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.00330
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00165

Measured 8d ago against content hash 55b2e554ca0f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analyzing-indicators-of-compromise scanned grade A with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Sends data to an external URLlowData exfiltration

A POST to an outside endpoint may be telemetry or may be exfiltration; either way the mod talks to somewhere, and you should know where.

response = requests.post( "https://mb-api.abuse.ch/api/v1/",

Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

response = requests.get(
Origin

This is a copy

84% identical to analyzing-indicators-of-compromise — 59 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/asi/skills/analyzing-indicators-of-compromise/SKILL.md · 149 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 149 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Analyzing Indicators of Compromise

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • A phishing email or alert generates IOCs (URLs, IP addresses, file hashes) requiring rapid triage
  • Automated feeds deliver bulk IOCs that need confidence scoring before ingestion into blocking controls
  • An incident investigation requires contextual enrichment of observed network artifacts

Do not use this skill in isolation for high-stakes blocking decisions — always combine automated enrichment with analyst judgment, especially for shared infrastructure (CDNs, cloud providers).

Prerequisites

  • VirusTotal API key (free or Enterprise) for multi-AV and sandbox lookup
  • AbuseIPDB API key for IP reputation checks
  • MISP instance or TIP for cross-referencing against known campaigns
  • Python with requests and vt-py libraries, or SOAR platform with pre-built connectors

Workflow

Step 1: Normalize and Classify IOC Types

Before enriching, classify each IOC:

  • IPv4/IPv6 address: Check if RFC 1918 private (skip external enrichment), validate format
  • Domain/FQDN: Defang for safe handling (evil[.]com), extract registered domain via tldextract
  • URL: Extract domain + path separately; check for redirectors
  • File hash: Identify hash type (MD5/SHA-1/SHA-256); prefer SHA-256 for uniqueness
  • Email address: Split into domain (check MX/DMARC) and local part for pattern analysis

Defang IOCs in documentation (replace . with [.] and :// with [://]) to prevent accidental clicks.

Step 2: Multi-Source Enrichment

VirusTotal (file hash, URL, IP, domain):

import vt

client = vt.Client("YOUR_VT_API_KEY")

# File hash lookup
file_obj = client.get_object(f"/files/{sha256_hash}")
detections = file_obj.last_analysis_stats
print(f"Malicious: {detections['malicious']}/{sum(detections.values())}")

# Domain analysis
domain_obj = client.get_object(f"/domains/{domain}")
print(domain_obj.last_analysis_stats)
print(domain_obj.reputation)
client.close()

Read the full file on GitHub · 149 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 149 lines · 106 tokens per session scan A 55b2e554ca0f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analyzing-indicators-of-compromise is a skill published in the GitHub repository plurigrid/asi (62 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 106 tokens to every session and 1,650 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 2 findings (sends data to an external url, makes network calls). It is 84% identical to analyzing-indicators-of-compromise, differing in 59 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

analyzing-indicators-of-compromise

Analyzes indicators of compromise (IOCs) including IP addresses, domains, file hashes, URLs, and email artifacts to determine maliciousness confidence, campaign attribution, and blocking priority. Use when triaging IOCs from phishing emails, security alerts, or external threat feeds; enriching raw IOCs with…

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · 106 tokens

analyzing-indicators-of-compromise

Use when analyzes indicators of compromise (IOCs) including IP addresses, domains, file hashes, URLs, and email artifacts to determine maliciousness confidence, campaign attribution, and blocking priority. Use when triaging IOCs from phishing emails, security alerts, or external threat feeds; enriching raw IOCs with…

oyi77/1ai-skills · 107 tokens

analyzing-indicators-of-compromise

A guide for investigating indicators of compromise, or signs such as suspicious IP addresses, domains, URLs, file fingerprints, and email addresses. It combines information from several security-intelligence services.

killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh · 111 tokens

analyzing-indicators-of-compromise

Analyzes indicators of compromise (IOCs) including IP addresses, domains, file hashes, URLs, and email artifacts to determine maliciousness confidence, campaign attribution, and blocking priority. Use when triaging IOCs from phishing emails, security alerts, or external threat feeds; enriching raw IOCs with…

26zl/cybersec-toolkit · 106 tokens

analyzing-indicators-of-compromise

Analyzes indicators of compromise (IOCs) including IP addresses, domains, file hashes, URLs, and email artifacts to determine maliciousness confidence, campaign attribution, and blocking priority. Use when triaging IOCs from phishing emails, security alerts, or external threat feeds; enriching raw IOCs with…

balsm-health/Balsm-AI · 106 tokens

analyzing-indicators-of-compromise

Analyzes indicators of compromise (IOCs) including IP addresses, domains, file hashes, URLs, and email artifacts to determine maliciousness confidence, campaign attribution, and blocking priority. Use when triaging IOCs from phishing emails, security alerts, or external threat feeds; enriching raw IOCs with…

pinkpixel-dev/skills-collection-1 · 106 tokens