Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add plurigrid/asi --skill self-validation-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/plurigrid/asiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/plurigrid/asi/self-validation-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plurigrid/asi/self-validation-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plurigrid/asi/self-validation-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/plurigrid/asi/self-validation-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/plurigrid/asi/self-validation-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00233 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00093 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
self-validation-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Self-Validation Loop
Use when training or evaluating self-validation for 3-stream color systems.
Inputs
- seed, indices
- sources: splitmix_ternary, xoroshiro_3color, gay_mcp
- comparator: reafference or comparator
Workflow
- Predict expected colors (efference copy).
- Observe actual colors (color_at or stream generation).
- Compare predictions with observations.
- Aggregate accuracy and surprise.
Gay MCP tools
- gay_seed, efference_copy, color_at, reafference, comparator, active_inference, self_model
Metrics
- accuracy = matches / total
- surprise = mismatch count or summed error
- pass threshold: accuracy >= 0.99 or surprise == 0
Output
- JSON log with seed, indices, predicted, observed, errors, accuracy, surprise
Example prompt
"Run a self-validation loop over indices 1..20 and report accuracy and surprise."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A d128fb91c39c
self-validation-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository plurigrid/asi (70 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 233 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
eval-dataset-design
A guide to creating reliable test sets for AI agents. Each evaluation task includes the request, the simulated user's behaviour, a reset starting state, and a success check that can be independently verified.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.