Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PNGTRID/AnvilWiki --skill anvil-adsense-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PNGTRID/AnvilWikiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pngtrid/anvilwiki/anvil-adsense-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pngtrid/anvilwiki/anvil-adsense-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pngtrid/anvilwiki/anvil-adsense-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pngtrid/anvilwiki/anvil-adsense-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pngtrid/anvilwiki/anvil-adsense-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00136 | $0.02574 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.01287 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00515 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00257 |
Grade A, and why
anvil-adsense-audit scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- 浏览器/curl 实测 sitemap 3 个 URL How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AnvilWiki AdSense 申请前体检
回答一个问题:这个站现在交申请,是过、是拒、还是白交? 不凭感觉,逐项体检后给裁决。
核心规则
- Google 官方文档是唯一真相源:AdSense 计划政策、Google 发布商政策、网站质量指南。体检前先刷新一遍官方文档(政策会变);与本文冲突时,官方文档赢。
- 体检不保证过审——它排除的是「明知道会被拒还去交」的浪费;Google 的人工审核永远有主观成分。
- 每项必须四选一:
Pass(有证据)/Fail(有证据)/Unknown(写明缺什么才能判)/N/A(写明为什么不适用)。不许抽样,不许「整体看起来没问题」。 - 具体化:说「正文是抓取摘要且无增量评论」,不说「内容薄」;说「隐私政策没提第三方广告 cookie」,不说「隐私政策不完整」。
模板已解决的项(直接核对,别重复劳动)
这些是模板层承诺,体检时核对存在性即可标 Pass,把它们当免费的:
| 项 | 证据在哪 |
|---|---|
public/ads.txt 就绪授权行存在(注释态——未过审保持注释才是正确状态,占位 pub-ID 反而是无效数据行) |
过审后按文件内注释操作:填入你的发布商 ID、删行首 # 即生效 |
| 隐私政策 / 服务条款 / 版权 / 联系 / 关于 5 个法律页正文内置（非空壳路由），隐私页已含 Google AdSense 广告 cookie 披露段 | src/components/layout/LegalContent.astro；线上 /privacy-policy/ 应有 "Advertising partners (e.g. Google AdSense)" 段 |
| 广告组件 env 门控，默认零广告零弹窗 | PUBLIC_ADSENSE_* 不填就不渲染——申请期天然干净 |
| 空分类列表页 noindex 且不进 sitemap | build 后查 dist/sitemap*.xml |
sitemap 自动生成 + pnpm check-links 死链门禁 |
CI 八门禁 |
| Lighthouse 4×100(速度/体验基线) | 模板开箱契约 |
| 内链尾斜杠 + 语言前缀规范 | pnpm check-content 规则 5/6 |
⚠️ 模板已知缺口(体检时主动提):模板不带 public/robots.txt——Cloudflare Pages 默认对 Googlebot 放行,这本身不是问题;但如果用户自己加过 robots.txt,必须确认没挡 Mediapartners-Google 和 AdsBot-Google,挡了 = 广告抓取失败,典型 Fail 项。
用户侧清单(体检重点,逐项判定)
A. 资格与所有权
- AD-01 自有域名:是自定义域名,还是
*.pages.dev?(后者基本过不了审,见手册课 22「开广告:时机与接入」) - AD-02 所有权信号:站点能验证所有权(GSC / DNS / meta),站点上能看出「谁在运营」(关于页/联系页有真实内容,不是模板占位)。
B. 内容质量(最高频拒因)
- AD-03 篇数:数
src/content/wiki/<主语言>/下非 draft 的.mdx文件,≥15 篇(15-20 篇起申,手册课 22 与 docs/ads.md 口径)。 - AD-04 原创性:抽读 3-5 篇,判断是「自己的话写的攻略」还是「抓取摘要/换词复写/纯视频嵌入无文字」。给出抽读的文件路径和判断依据。
- AD-05 内容深度:抽读页是否覆盖搜索意图(有数据表/步骤/结论),还是 300 字空壳凑数。codes 页有码表即算合格;guides/bosses 页看正文是否答题。
- AD-06 时效性:
codes页lastModified是否在 7 天内(过期码挂「有效」= 内容价值直接判负,跑pnpm refresh-audit看 P0)。 - AD-07 语言一致性:主语言正文是否机翻痕迹明显(不通顺/术语混乱)。模板支持多语言,但申请语言的那个版本必须达到「人类愿意读」的水平。
- AD-08 分类结构:每个分类下都有真实文章(空分类列表页 noindex 了,但导航里挂着 6 个空分类 = 站点未完成信号)。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 102 lines · 136 tokens per session scan A fdc98c014651
anvil-adsense-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository PNGTRID/AnvilWiki (133 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 136 tokens to every session and 2,574 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
data-integrity
What this project is allowed to claim in public — the anchoring rule for AI-generated summaries, confidence states, attribution, and the wording of every published number. Use this skill whenever writing an LLM prompt, rendering generated prose, labelling a metric, designing a badge or status, drafting social posts…
astro
Build content-focused websites with Astro — zero JS by default, islands architecture, multi-framework components, and Markdown/MDX support.
compliance
Compliance expert for SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and security frameworks.
korean-privacy-terms
A skill package for creating privacy policies and terms of service for South Korea, the European Union, the United States, or combined Korean and EU use. It covers South Korea's PIPA, the EU's GDPR, and US CCPA/CPRA requirements.
privacy-us
A guided tool for creating a US privacy policy based on the California CCPA/CPRA and several other state privacy laws. It asks about the service, the data collected, service providers, dates, and design preferences.
privacy-global-jp
A document generator for Korean services that also serve people in Japan. It creates Korean and Japanese privacy policies and terms of service while reflecting relevant rules in both countries.