Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pnp/sharepoint-skills --skill permission-reportgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pnp/sharepoint-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/permission-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/permission-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/permission-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/permission-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/permission-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.01094 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00547 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00219 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
permission-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Permission Report
When to use
Use this skill when the user wants a read-only review of who has access to SharePoint files, folders, libraries, lists, or a site, especially requests such as “who has access,” “permission report,” “sharing report,” “access review,” or “review permissions.”
Inputs
Use the current SharePoint context by default. Determine the reporting scope from the user’s request and available context:
- Selected files or folders, if the user has selected items or says “these/this.”
- A named library or list, if the user names one.
- The whole current site, if no narrower scope is provided.
Only report content and permission details the current user can already see. Never invent access data.
Steps
-
Stay strictly read-only on permissions.
- Never grant, revoke, change, break, restore, or otherwise modify sharing or permissions.
- Do not create sharing links or invite users.
- Use only discovery, listing, permission-checking, and file-creation tools needed to produce the report.
-
Resolve the scope.
- If items are selected, report on those selected files or folders.
- If a list or library is named, resolve it from the current site and report on that list/library and representative or included items as supported by available permission tools.
- If no narrower scope is clear, report across accessible user-created lists and libraries on the current site.
- If a scope cannot be resolved, state that plainly in the report and do not guess.
-
Collect access information. For each scoped site/list/library/file/folder where available, read:
- Who has access: users, groups, sharing principals, and links.
- Permission level: normalize to Full Control, Edit, Read, or Other/Unknown.
- Whether access is inherited or uniquely set.
- Any sharing links, especially Anyone links.
- External or guest users. If a tool fails or returns partial/empty permission data, record that limitation plainly; do not fill gaps from assumptions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 116 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 8e3a079cb60f
permission-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository pnp/sharepoint-skills (118 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 1,094 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
skill-doc-delivery
Convert markdown to DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, PDF office documents — use when you need exportable deliverables.
skill-writing-plans
Create zero-context implementation plans with bite-sized tasks — use for multi-step feature planning.
skill-copilot-provider
GitHub Copilot CLI as optional zero-cost provider via copilot -p programmatic mode.
bf-to-agents-sdk-dotnet-migration
Use when migrating a Bot Framework .NET SDK bot to Microsoft 365 Agents SDK. Triggered by projects that depend on packages: Microsoft.Bot.Builder or Microsoft.Bot.Builder.Integration.AspNet.Core that want to migrate to Agents SDK.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.