Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pnp/sharepoint-skills --skill rfp-response-compliance-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pnp/sharepoint-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/rfp-response-compliance-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/rfp-response-compliance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/rfp-response-compliance-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/rfp-response-compliance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/rfp-response-compliance-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.02483 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01241 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00497 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00248 |
Grade A, and why
rfp-response-compliance-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 240 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compliance Review Skill
Firm Profile (REQUIRED — fill in before use)
These values define who your firm is and how it writes. See SETUP.md.
- FIRM NAME: [FIRM NAME]
- WHAT THE FIRM DOES: [one sentence]
- ROLE BOUNDARY: [what the firm will NOT claim to do — leave blank if none]
- VENDOR STANCE: [vendor-neutral OR resells/implements specific products]
- SPECIALIZATION: [domains the firm credibly claims]
- VOICE: [3–5 adjectives]
The rule set in this skill is an EXAMPLE written for an independent advisory firm, included to show the shape of a good rule set. Before use, replace the rule content with your firm's actual compliance rules derived from your
Firm Profileand style/compliance guide. Keep the structure (categories, severity, detect/why/fix); change only the content.
Purpose
Before any proposal leaves the firm, it must pass a compliance review covering: language that misrepresents the firm's role or positioning, commitments the firm cannot or should not make, omitted required disclosures, and violations of the procurement's submission standards. This skill runs against the salesperson-reviewed draft (post-Phase 3) and produces a structured findings log. No proposal proceeds to publication until all High severity findings are resolved.
This skill is strictly rule-based. Subjective tone and quality judgments are handled by the Quality & Tone Review skill.
Prerequisites
- The salesperson-reviewed draft must be in the WIP Collaboration Folder. Do not run against the raw Phase 3 draft — wait for the human review checkpoint.
- All Phase 3 placeholders must be filled. If placeholders remain, halt and notify the user — placeholders cannot be compliance-checked.
- The Review Findings SharePoint list must be accessible for logging.
- The firm's style and compliance guide (source of truth for prohibited terms and required language) should be accessible — confirm its location if uncertain.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 240 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 86f7aa7b5c7f
rfp-response-compliance-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository pnp/sharepoint-skills (118 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 2,483 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
carta-witness-signatures
Status of witness and spousal-consent signature requests on option grants, RSAs, PIUs — who still needs to sign, and what's awaiting signature, signed, or expired. Covers one award, one company, or a whole portfolio. Read-only.
carta-hmrc-limits
Report a UK company's HMRC EMI/CSOP limit usage. Use when asked how much EMI allowance is left, whether the company is near the £6m EMI limit, who is close to or over their £250k individual limit, CSOP headroom, or whether a planned grant fits.
carta-interaction-reference-core
The non-negotiable half of Carta's AI agent interaction rules — financial precision, data provenance, the AI-computation gate, how to confirm, and trust & safety. Loaded ONCE per conversation, before any response that presents or writes Carta financial data. Sufficient on its own for write flows; a flow that also…
purview-customer-key
Guidance for Microsoft Purview Customer Key and Double Key Encryption (DKE) — customer-controlled encryption for service-side data (Customer Key for Exchange/SharePoint/OneDrive/Teams/Purview) and client-side double encryption for highly sensitive documents (DKE via sensitivity labels and a customer-hosted key…
compliance-manager
Guidance for Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager — continuous compliance posture across Microsoft and non-Microsoft assets, mapped to 360+ regulatory templates (ISO 27001/27018/27701, SOC 2, NIST 800-53/171/CSF, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, FedRAMP, IRAP, Essential Eight, DORA, EU AI Act, etc.). Covers compliance score…
purview-general
Orientation skill for the Microsoft Purview data security, governance, and compliance suite. Helps choose the right Purview solution for a goal and understand the unified portal, roles, and licensing model. WHEN: Microsoft Purview overview, which Purview solution, Purview portal, data governance vs data security vs…