topic-explainer

topic-explainer is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from pnp/sharepoint-skills. It costs 121 tokens per session (1,264 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An interactive dashboard that explains a topic through cards, comparisons, examples, and other selected sections. It is designed to help a business audience understand an unfamiliar subject.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create topic explainers, comparison pages, decision guides, use-case overviews, and governance notes from provided or researched information.
Why use it?
It turns scattered or difficult information into a structured explanation with optional sources and cautions. The sections can be adapted to the topic and audience.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to create topic explainers, comparison pages, decision guides, use-case overviews, and governance notes from provided or researched information.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/topic-explainer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add pnp/sharepoint-skills --skill topic-explainer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pnp/sharepoint-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for topic-explainer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/topic-explainer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/topic-explainer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/topic-explainer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/topic-explainer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for topic-explainer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/topic-explainer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pnp/sharepoint-skills/topic-explainer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 121 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,264 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00121 $0.01264
Opus 5.5 $0.00048 $0.00506
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00024 $0.00253
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00126

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 7e32f6cee9fe, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

topic-explainer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Skills/topic-explainer/topic-explainer/SKILL.md · 107 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Topic Explainer

When to use

Use this skill whenever the user asks to create an explainer, explainer page, or explainer dashboard for a topic. The output should be a polished, interactive HTML dashboard that explains the topic clearly for a business audience.

Use a clean, professional card-based design as the content model, but adapt the sections to fit the topic and content. Do not force every section into every dashboard.

Inputs

  • Required: the topic to explain.
  • Optional: target audience, organization/team context, preferred tone, source files/pages, and whether the dashboard should be saved as a SharePoint file or shown inline.
  • If the topic needs current, enterprise, or document-specific information, retrieve or summarize the relevant content first. Do not invent source-specific claims.

Steps

  1. Identify the explainer topic, audience, and main user need from the request.
  2. Decide which sections fit the topic before building the dashboard. Use the strongest-fit sections only:
    • Always consider: hero/header, shortest version, core concept cards, active-detail panel, comparison table, use cases/examples, governance or watch-outs, and source notes.
    • Include a decision guide only when the topic asks users to choose between options, make a recommendation, follow a path, or decide “when to use what”.
    • Include a Without vs With section only when the topic naturally compares adopting a capability, method, or maturity step. Skip it for side-by-side product comparisons where it feels artificial.
    • Include a context overload / complexity explanation only when reusable instructions, knowledge context, complexity, or prompt burden is central to the topic.
    • Include implementation, rollout, adoption, governance, or operating model sections only when relevant.
  3. If a section is skipped, rebalance the layout. Do not leave an empty adjacent panel. Expand the neighboring section to full width, replace the skipped section with a better-fit section, or use a single-column layout for that row.
  4. Build the dashboard content around the selected sections. Common section options:
    • Hero/header with a short title, subtitle, and “shortest version”.
    • 3–5 core concept cards for the most important ideas in the topic.
    • Active concept detail panel containing: what it is, analogy, when to use it, example prompts/scenarios, and watch-outs.
    • Decision guide with practical questions and recommendations, when relevant.
    • Clear comparison table across the core concepts, platforms, methods, or options.
    • “Without vs with” section, only when it creates real explanatory value.
    • Topic-specific section such as channel selection, operating principles, adoption playbook, risks, anti-patterns, stakeholder map, maturity model, or examples.
    • Searchable use cases and examples by team, role, or scenario.
    • Governance notes, risks, or implementation considerations.
    • Source notes listing the sources or assumptions used.
  5. Create the dashboard as standalone HTML/CSS/JavaScript rather than raw React unless the environment explicitly supports React build output.
  6. Preserve a clean professional design spirit:
    • Clean card-based layout.
    • Interactive concept selection.
    • Search/filter for use cases where useful.
    • Professional, clear tone with plain-language explanations, analogies, practical examples, and clear distinctions between concepts, benefits, limitations, and governance.
  7. Use this content schema when adapting the original code:

Read the full file on GitHub · 107 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 107 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A 7e32f6cee9fe

Subscribe to this mod's changes

topic-explainer is a skill published in the GitHub repository pnp/sharepoint-skills (140 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 1,264 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

frontend-slides

OpenDesign as a worked AI-workflow example: how local agents read your files and design on your desktop — concretely. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for teams new to AI, leadership.

nexu-io/open-design · 45 tokens

manim-composer

Trigger when: (1) User wants to create an educational/explainer video, (2) User has a vague concept they want visualized, (3) User mentions "3b1b style" or "explain like 3Blue1Brown", (4) User wants to plan a Manim video or animation sequence, (5) User asks to "compose" or "plan" a math/science visualization.…

calesthio/OpenMontage · 174 tokens

extract-wisdom

Extract wisdom, insights, and actionable takeaways from YouTube videos, blog posts, articles, or text files. Use when asked to extract wisdom or key insights from a given content source.

sammcj/agentic-coding · 43 tokens

ml-llm-wiki

Use when answering questions from this machine-learning knowledge base. Triggers: questions about transformers, attention cost and efficiency, and long-context scaling; 'what do we know about attention', 'check the ML wiki'. Read-only querying of compiled knowledge; to add, update, supersede, lint, audit, or critique…

sammcj/agentic-coding · 80 tokens

deliberate-ai-use

Bevisst KI-bruk i Nav: grønn og rød sone, tre-forsøks-regelen, erfaringsnivå og generer-så-forstå, med forskningen bak. Bruk når utvikleren spør om KI bør gjøre en oppgave, vil lære, eller når en oppgave skal plasseres i grønn eller rød sone.

navikt/copilot · 84 tokens

explain

Explain a concept, system or piece of code as a diagram-first terminal answer, or as an interactive HTML page.

sammcj/agentic-coding · 26 tokens