Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pofky/asc-mcp --skill asc-review-triagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pofky/asc-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pofky/asc-mcp/asc-review-triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pofky/asc-mcp/asc-review-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pofky/asc-mcp/asc-review-triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pofky/asc-mcp/asc-review-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pofky/asc-mcp/asc-review-triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00102 | $0.00789 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00394 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
asc-review-triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
App Store review triage
When the user asks about reviews, ratings, or customer feedback for their App Store apps, follow this procedure using the asc-mcp tools.
Step 1. Identify the app
If the user specified an app name or ID, use it. Otherwise:
- Call
list_appsto get the full list. - If there is only one app, use it.
- If there are several, ask the user which app they mean. Do not guess.
Step 2. Pull reviews
Call list_reviews with:
app_id: the app ID from step 1rating: 3 (covers 1, 2, and 3 star reviews when sorted correctly)sort:newestlimit: 20 for a quick scan, up to 100 for a deep dive
If the user specifically asked about 1-star reviews only, set rating: 1. If they asked about all reviews (positive and negative), call list_reviews without a rating filter.
Step 3. Confirm review status
Call review_status with the same app_id. This tells the user whether a new version is in review or waiting, which often correlates with review-score dips.
Step 4. Summarize
Produce a concise summary with:
- Total reviews in the window
- Breakdown by rating (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
- 3 to 5 themes, each with a review-count and one representative quote
- Any single review flagged as potentially actionable (specific bug report, feature request, competitor mention)
- The current review-queue status from step 3
Guardrails
- Do not invent reviews. Quote only what
list_reviewsreturned. - Do not post a reply. This skill reads only. Drafting or posting responses is a separate Pro feature not in this skill.
- If
list_reviewsreturns nothing, say so plainly. - On the free tier,
list_reviewsrefuses instead of returning reviews. Say so plainly, then offer the trial:asc_start_trialunlocks every tool for 7 days with no card and takes effect in the running session. It needs the user's real email, so ask for it rather than inventing one, and do not call it unprompted. If they would rather just subscribe, Pro is $9 a month at https://buy.polar.sh/polar_cl_y86PS4ruc848PXevVvSYS49S8gZY8JYWF192v1UEgjj.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 59 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A d60cf3d84212
asc-review-triage is a skill published in the GitHub repository pofky/asc-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 789 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
apple-cleanup
Exhaustive engineering hardening of an iOS app. Reviews for Swift 6 compliance, crash risks, App Store rejection risks, and tech debt; builds a surgical plan; dispatches parallel subagents to fix all P0-P2 issues; then pushes an alpha to TestFlight. Use for pre-submission cleanup and code hardening, not design polish.
ios-test
XCTest patterns for unit tests, UI tests, and SwiftData testing with in-memory containers under Swift 6 strict concurrency, plus test performance budgets. Use when writing or fixing tests, setting up test targets, testing SwiftData models, or planning CI test suites. Trigger on "write a test", "unit test", "XCTest"…
apple-polish
Design and keynote-readiness craftsmanship review of an iOS app. Evaluates through Jony Ive (visual obsession) and Steve Jobs (demo readiness) perspectives, presents prioritized findings, then orchestrates parallel agents to fix selected issues and push a TestFlight build. Use for design polish, not engineering bugs.
apple-review
Comprehensive Apple-grade review of an iOS app covering design (Apple design leader perspective), engineering (architecture and code quality), compliance (App Store rejection risks), and keynote readiness (product story and demo quality). Use when asked for a full app review, Apple-quality audit, design critique, HIG…
swift6-concurrency
Handle Swift 6 concurrency patterns. Use when encountering Sendable warnings, data race errors, MainActor isolation issues, or framework interop problems (EventKit, Speech, AVFoundation, etc.). Trigger on "Swift 6 error", "Sendable", "data race", "MainActor", "concurrency warning", or "strict concurrency".
app-rejection-recovery
Diagnoses App Store rejections, drafts Resolution Center responses, and plans the fix for resubmission. Use when the user says "my app was rejected", "Apple rejected my app", "App Review rejection", "guideline violation", "Resolution Center response", "guideline 2.1", "guideline 4.3", "guideline 5.1.1", "binary…