auditing-interface-quality

auditing-interface-quality is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from porcupine-md/jonggrang. It costs 21 tokens per session (653 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only review guide for checking interface quality across accessibility, speed, themes, and different screen sizes. When the app can run, it also checks the rendered page in a browser.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit frontend components and live pages for accessibility issues, performance concerns, responsive-layout problems, and theme-related defects.
Why use it?
It finds usability and compliance problems without changing the application source code.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to audit frontend components and live pages for accessibility issues, performance concerns, responsive-layout problems, and theme-related defects.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/porcupine-md/jonggrang/auditing-interface-quality
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add porcupine-md/jonggrang --skill auditing-interface-quality
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/porcupine-md/jonggrang

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for auditing-interface-quality

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/porcupine-md/jonggrang/auditing-interface-quality.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/porcupine-md/jonggrang/auditing-interface-quality)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/porcupine-md/jonggrang/auditing-interface-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/porcupine-md/jonggrang/auditing-interface-quality.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 21 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 653 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00021 $0.00653
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00327
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00131
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00065

Measured 8d ago against content hash 662b40fc1aba, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

auditing-interface-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/library/frontend/auditing-interface-quality/SKILL.md · 51 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 51 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Auditing Interface Quality

Role Constraints: Reviewer (STRICTLY READ-ONLY for application code). You MAY NOT modify, fix, or write to application source code. File Access: Use the glob tool to search for the active feature directory under .jonggrang/.output/features/. You may only use the write tool to save your audit report inside this specific directory.

Objective

Perform a systematic audit of the interface quality across accessibility (A11y), performance, theming, and responsive design.

Execution Steps

  1. Discover Context: Use glob and read to review the frontend components built or modified for the current feature.
  2. Live Browser Check (anoa): Whenever the app can be served, validate the rendered UI — not just the source — with the anoa CLI (preinstalled in the sandbox). It only observes the page, so it is safe under the read-only Reviewer role. The browser is a session: start it once, then every command attaches to it.
    anoa --headless --port 9222 &                # once; `anoa status` exit 3 = not running
    anoa open <app-url> && anoa wait --load
    anoa snapshot -i                             # interactive elements with @refs
    anoa screenshot audit-desktop.png
    anoa set viewport 375 812                    # re-check responsive
    anoa screenshot audit-mobile.png
    anoa set media dark && anoa screenshot audit-dark.png
    anoa errors                                  # a page can look right and still throw
    
    Save screenshots into the active feature directory. See skills/core/anoa/SKILL.md for the tool and skills/library/frontend/validating-visual-design/SKILL.md for the full workflow.
  3. Diagnostic Scan (use the snapshot/screenshots as evidence):
    • Accessibility (A11y): Check for contrast issues, missing ARIA roles, poor keyboard navigation, semantic HTML, and alt text.
    • Performance: Look for layout thrashing, expensive animations, unoptimized images, or unnecessary re-renders.
    • Theming: Look for hard-coded colors instead of design tokens, and broken dark mode implementations.
    • Responsive Design: Check for fixed widths, touch target sizes (<44px), and horizontal scrolling issues on narrow viewports.
  4. Compile Audit Report:
    • Document each issue with its Location, Severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low), Category, Impact, and Recommendation.
    • Summarize the overall UI/UX compliance.
  5. Save Report:
    • Write the final audit report using the write tool to .jonggrang/.output/features/<active-feature-dir>/interface-audit.md.

Read the full file on GitHub · 51 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 51 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 662b40fc1aba

Subscribe to this mod's changes

auditing-interface-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository porcupine-md/jonggrang (11 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 653 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

chakra-ui-builder

Build responsive, accessible UI components and layouts using Chakra UI v3, install or configure Chakra UI in new and existing projects, and design scalable themes using tokens, semantic tokens, recipes, and slot recipes. Use this skill whenever a user asks to build, create, or generate any UI component, page, form…

chakra-ui/chakra-ui · 214 tokens

visual-ralph

Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ralph with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.

Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex · 50 tokens

frontend-visual-qa

Audits already-rendered web, landing-page, HTML deck/slide, browser tool/game, dashboard/admin, design-system, and desktop UIs using real-browser or native-app journeys, inspected screenshots, DOM geometry, responsive or projection viewports, and a bundled Playwright sweep. Use after UI implementation to find…

daymade/claude-code-skills · 145 tokens

prototype-web

A clickable, high-fidelity web product prototype with navigation, a hero section, feature cards, steps, social proof, and optional pricing. It is designed to resemble a finished landing page while remaining a prototype.

nexu-io/html-anything · 24 tokens

animation-principles

Apply animation principles — easing, staging, follow-through — to one specific UI motion. Use when tuning how an animation feels. For product-wide duration and easing tokens use motion-system (design-systems); for a full interaction spec use micro-interaction-spec.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 59 tokens

refactoring-ui

Audit and fix visual hierarchy, spacing, color, and depth in web UIs. Use when the user mentions "my UI looks off" (or amateur/unprofessional), "fix the design", "Tailwind styling", "color palette", "visual hierarchy", "design system", "spacing scale", or "component styling". Also trigger when building consistent…

wondelai/skills · 132 tokens