reviewing-frontend-aesthetics

reviewing-frontend-aesthetics is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from porcupine-md/jonggrang. It costs 62 tokens per session (1,498 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only review process for checking the visual quality of frontend code. It examines hierarchy, spacing, accessibility, consistency, and signs of formulaic interface design.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during design verification or quality reviews of frontend pages and components. It produces prioritized feedback about visual structure, accessibility, spacing, and styling.
Why use it?
It turns visual problems into a written list of concrete issues for a developer to fix. Because it does not edit application code, the review remains separate from implementation.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Use it during design verification or quality reviews of frontend pages and components. It produces prioritized feedback about visual structure, accessibility, spacing, and styling.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/porcupine-md/jonggrang/reviewing-frontend-aesthetics
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add porcupine-md/jonggrang --skill reviewing-frontend-aesthetics
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/porcupine-md/jonggrang

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for reviewing-frontend-aesthetics

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/porcupine-md/jonggrang/reviewing-frontend-aesthetics/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/porcupine-md/jonggrang/reviewing-frontend-aesthetics)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/porcupine-md/jonggrang/reviewing-frontend-aesthetics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/porcupine-md/jonggrang/reviewing-frontend-aesthetics/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for reviewing-frontend-aesthetics

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/porcupine-md/jonggrang/reviewing-frontend-aesthetics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/porcupine-md/jonggrang/reviewing-frontend-aesthetics.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 62 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,498 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00062 $0.01498
Opus 5 $0.00031 $0.00749
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00300
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00150

Measured 12d ago against content hash 434bf27a4b26, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

reviewing-frontend-aesthetics scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/library/frontend/reviewing-frontend-aesthetics/SKILL.md · 128 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Reviewing Frontend Aesthetics (Phase 9 & 11: Reviewer)

Overview

As the Reviewer agent in Phase 9 (DesignVerify) and Phase 11 (Quality), your role is to perform a systematic, read-only quality check of the frontend code and generate a comprehensive audit report with prioritized issues and actionable recommendations.

CRITICAL: You are read-only regarding application source code (do not modify .ts, .css, etc.). Your only allowed write action is generating the audit report. You do not fix issues yourself. You document them systematically so the Developer (or other roles) can address them. Your goal is to catch all the small details that separate good work from great work, and to ruthlessly detect "AI slop" patterns.

Pre-Review Assessment

Understand the current state and goals:

  1. Review completeness: Is it functionally complete? Are there known issues to preserve (mark with TODOs)?
  2. Quality bar: MVP vs flagship feature?
  3. Design System: Read AGENTS.md and the architecture plan to understand the intended aesthetic direction.

Diagnostic Scan (The Core Audit)

Conduct a holistic design critique across these dimensions. Think like a design director giving feedback.

1. AI Slop Detection (CRITICAL)

This is the most important check. Does this code/interface look like every other AI-generated interface from 2024-2025?

  • Check for the AI color palette (cyan-on-dark, purple-to-blue gradients, neon accents).
  • Check for identical card grids (icon + heading + text repeated endlessly).
  • Check for generic hero copy ("Unlock the power of...", "Your all-in-one solution for...").
  • Check for decorative blobs, floating circles, wavy SVG dividers.
  • Check for centered everything (text-align: center on all headings/cards).
  • Check for uniform bubbly border-radius on every element.
  • Check for default font stacks (Inter, Roboto, Arial, system).

The test: If you showed this to someone and said "AI made this," would they believe you immediately?

Read the full file on GitHub · 128 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 128 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 434bf27a4b26

Subscribe to this mod's changes

reviewing-frontend-aesthetics is a skill published in the GitHub repository porcupine-md/jonggrang (11 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,498 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

chakra-ui-builder

Build responsive, accessible UI components and layouts using Chakra UI v3, install or configure Chakra UI in new and existing projects, and design scalable themes using tokens, semantic tokens, recipes, and slot recipes. Use this skill whenever a user asks to build, create, or generate any UI component, page, form…

chakra-ui/chakra-ui · 214 tokens

visual-ralph

Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ultragoal with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.

Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex · 52 tokens

frontend-ui-dark-ts

Build dark-themed React applications using Tailwind CSS with custom theming, glassmorphism effects, and Framer Motion animations. Use when creating dashboards, admin panels, or data-rich interfaces with a refined dark aesthetic.

microsoft/skills · 48 tokens

reveal-hover-effect

Build cursor-following spotlight reveals that expose a second aligned image through a soft radial mask. Use for hover-to-color, before-and-after, x-ray, material, texture, product-detail, and illustrated hero effects where a desaturated or embossed base image should remain visible while another treatment follows an…

MengTo/Skills · 66 tokens

frontend-visual-qa

Audits already-rendered web, landing-page, HTML deck/slide, browser tool/game, dashboard/admin, design-system, and desktop UIs using real-browser or native-app journeys, inspected screenshots, DOM geometry, responsive or projection viewports, and a bundled Playwright sweep. Use after UI implementation to find…

daymade/claude-code-skills · 145 tokens

prototype-web

A clickable, high-fidelity web product prototype with navigation, a hero section, feature cards, steps, social proof, and optional pricing. It is designed to resemble a finished landing page while remaining a prototype.

nexu-io/html-anything · 24 tokens