Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add poshan0126/dotclaude --skill test-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/poshan0126/dotclaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/poshan0126/dotclaude/test-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/poshan0126/dotclaude/test-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/poshan0126/dotclaude/test-writer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.01035 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00517 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
test-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Write comprehensive tests for the code that was just added or changed.
Step 1: Discover What Changed
Change under test (injected at load — already in front of you, no tool call needed):
git diff --stat HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo "(no diff vs HEAD — inspect git status manually)"
git diff HEAD 2>/dev/null || true
- The diff above is the change under test. If it is empty (already committed or amended elsewhere), run
git diff,git diff --cached, orgit show HEADto locate the change - Read each changed file to understand the behavior being added
- Identify the project's existing test framework, patterns, and conventions by finding existing test files
- Place new test files next to the source files or in the project's established test directory. Match whatever the project already does
Step 2: Analyze Every Code Path
For each new or modified function/method/component, map out:
- Happy path. Normal input, expected output
- Edge cases. Empty input, single element, boundary values (0, 1, -1, MAX_INT)
- Null/undefined/nil. What happens with missing data
- Type boundaries. Wrong types, type coercion traps
- Error paths. Invalid input, network failures, timeouts, permission denied
- Concurrency. Race conditions, parallel calls with shared state
- State transitions. Initial state, intermediate states, final state
- Integration points. How this code interacts with its dependencies
Step 3: Write the Tests
For EACH scenario identified above, write a test. No skipping.
Structure
- One assertion per test. If a test name needs "and", split it into two tests
- Descriptive names. Test names read as sentences describing the behavior:
should return empty array when input is emptyshould throw ValidationError when email format is invalidshould retry 3 times before failing on network timeout
- Arrange-Act-Assert. Set up, execute, verify. Clear separation.
What to Test
Pure functions / business logic:
- Every branch (if/else, switch, ternary)
- Every thrown error with exact error type and message
- Return value types and shapes
- Side effects (mutations, calls to external services)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 114 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A f897c726cfa7
test-writer is a skill published in the GitHub repository poshan0126/dotclaude (860 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 1,035 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.