Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/posit-dev/skills/testing-r-packagesnpx skills add posit-dev/skills --skill testing-r-packagesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/posit-dev/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/posit-dev/skills/testing-r-packages)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/posit-dev/skills/testing-r-packages"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/posit-dev/skills/testing-r-packages.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00067 | $0.02916 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01458 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00583 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00292 |
Grade A, and why
testing-r-packages scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 427 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing R Packages with testthat
Modern best practices for R package testing using testthat 3+.
Initial Setup
Initialize testing with testthat 3rd edition:
usethis::use_testthat(3)
This creates tests/testthat/ directory, adds testthat to DESCRIPTION Suggests with Config/testthat/edition: 3, and creates tests/testthat.R.
File Organization
Mirror package structure:
- Code in
R/foofy.R→ tests intests/testthat/test-foofy.R - Use
usethis::use_r("foofy")andusethis::use_test("foofy")to create paired files
Special files:
helper-*.R- Helper functions and custom expectations, sourced before testssetup-*.R- Run duringR CMD checkonly, not duringload_all()fixtures/- Static test data files accessed viatest_path()
Test Structure
Tests follow a three-level hierarchy: File → Test → Expectation
Standard Syntax
test_that("descriptive behavior", {
result <- my_function(input)
expect_equal(result, expected_value)
})
Test descriptions should read naturally and describe behavior, not implementation.
BDD Syntax (describe/it)
For behavior-driven development, use describe() and it():
describe("matrix()", {
it("can be multiplied by a scalar", {
m1 <- matrix(1:4, 2, 2)
m2 <- m1 * 2
expect_equal(matrix(1:4 * 2, 2, 2), m2)
})
it("can be transposed", {
m <- matrix(1:4, 2, 2)
expect_equal(t(m), matrix(c(1, 3, 2, 4), 2, 2))
})
})
Key features:
describe()groups related specifications for a componentit()defines individual specifications (liketest_that())- Supports nesting for hierarchical organization
it()without code creates pending test placeholders
Use describe() to verify you implement the right things, use test_that() to ensure you do things right.
See references/bdd.md for comprehensive BDD patterns, nested specifications, and test-first workflows.
Running Tests
Three scales of testing:
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 427 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A f2149c04e837
testing-r-packages is a skill published in the GitHub repository posit-dev/skills (488 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 2,916 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…