Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-reportgeneratorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-reportgenerator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-reportgenerator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-reportgenerator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-reportgenerator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-reportgenerator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00934 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00374 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-reportgenerator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to reportgenerator — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ReportGenerator for .NET
Trigger On
- the repo uses or wants
ReportGenerator - CI needs human-readable coverage reports
- multiple coverage files must be merged
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- raw coverage collection with no reporting need
Inputs
- the nearest
AGENTS.md - existing coverage artifacts
- desired output formats
Quick Start
- Read the nearest
AGENTS.mdand confirm scope and constraints. - Run this skill's
Workflowthrough theRalph Loopuntil outcomes are acceptable. - Return the
Required Result Formatwith concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
- Keep collection and rendering separate: Coverlet collects, ReportGenerator renders.
- Prefer the local or manifest-based .NET tool for reproducible CI runs.
- Choose output formats deliberately:
HtmlSummaryCoberturaMarkdownSummaryGithub- badges
- Merge multiple reports only when the repo really needs a consolidated view.
Bootstrap When Missing
If ReportGenerator is not configured yet:
- Detect current state:
rg --files -g '.config/dotnet-tools.json'dotnet tool list --localdotnet tool list --globalcommand -v reportgenerator
- Prefer local tool installation for reproducible CI:
dotnet new tool-manifest(if missing)dotnet tool install dotnet-reportgenerator-globaltool
- Add one explicit render command to
AGENTS.mdand CI, for example:dotnet tool run reportgenerator -reports:"**/coverage.cobertura.xml" -targetdir:"artifacts/coverage" -reporttypes:"HtmlSummary;Cobertura"
- Run the report command once and return
status: configuredorstatus: improved. - If raw coverage outputs are already sufficient and no rendered artifacts are needed, return
status: not_applicable.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 114 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A dc3643b9cd8a
dotnet-reportgenerator is a skill published in the GitHub repository Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills (13 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 934 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to reportgenerator, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
component-tester
Run Vitest tests for a specific component with coverage. Use when making changes to React components to ensure tests pass and coverage is maintained.
aws-unit-testing
Generate thorough unit tests for AWS Python business logic with full branch coverage, boundary value analysis, and edge case testing. Isolates pure logic from AWS dependencies using mocks. Covers every if/elif/else, try/except, guard clause, loop variant, and data transformation. Uses pytest parametrize for boundary…
aws-e2e-testing
Generate comprehensive end-to-end tests for AWS Python services by reading the actual handler code logic. Covers API Gateway Lambda proxies, Step Function workflows, and Batch job executions. Use when asked to write E2E tests, end-to-end tests, workflow tests, API tests against a deployed environment, or smoke tests…
aws-integration-testing
Generate comprehensive integration tests for AWS Python Lambda functions, Batch jobs, and services that interact with S3, DynamoDB, RDS/PostgreSQL, SQS, SNS, EventBridge, Kinesis, and other AWS services. Uses moto for in-process AWS mocking and testcontainers for real database testing. Reads the handler source code to…
aws-perf-load-testing
Generate performance benchmarks and load tests for AWS Python services. Performance tests measure Lambda latency, memory usage, cold start time, and batch throughput using pytest-benchmark and tracemalloc. Load tests use Locust to simulate concurrent users against API Gateway endpoints. Reads handler code to build…
aws-contract-testing
Generate contract tests that validate API schemas, request/response shapes, required fields, security definitions, and step function input/output contracts. Works with OpenAPI/Swagger specs, SAM templates, and CloudFormation. Uses jsonschema and pydantic for validation. All tests run offline with zero network calls.…