adversarial-swift

adversarial-swift is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from pproenca/dot-skills. It costs 96 tokens per session (2,667 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A pass/fail review gate for Swift code that checks concurrency, state, error handling, and collection-related problems against specific rules. It reviews a diff or set of files but does not fix the code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Swift app logic, server code, command-line tools, or packages for concurrency and correctness problems.
Why use it?
It finds failure cases such as unfinished asynchronous work, ignored cancellation, lost errors, and unsafe collection logic before a change is merged. Its independent review can catch mistakes made during automated coding.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents; mentions Codex.

Good fit Use it to review Swift app logic, server code, command-line tools, or packages for concurrency and correctness problems.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/pproenca/dot-skills/adversarial-swift
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add pproenca/dot-skills --skill adversarial-swift
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pproenca/dot-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for adversarial-swift

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pproenca/dot-skills/adversarial-swift.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pproenca/dot-skills/adversarial-swift)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pproenca/dot-skills/adversarial-swift"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pproenca/dot-skills/adversarial-swift.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 96 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,667 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00096 $0.02667
Opus 5 $0.00048 $0.01333
Sonnet 5 $0.00019 $0.00533
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00267

Measured 5d ago against content hash f68e0b90f76b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

adversarial-swift scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/.experimental/adversarial-swift/SKILL.md · 75 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Adversarial Swift Gate

A Swift language review gate — pass/fail: a single blind reviewer subagent judges the work against this gate's rules with an adversarial mandate, and the work passes only when every rule is PASS or N/A. This skill renders verdicts; it never fixes the work.

The rules are filtered down to the checks a reviewer can decide from code evidence alone. The gate judges the failure modes agents and experienced-but-not-expert developers actually produce: continuations that hang, loops that ignore cancellation, serialized independent awaits, hand-synchronized derived state, discarded underlying errors, hand-maintained case lists that rot, boolean parameter rows, O(n²) collection accumulation, and index arithmetic that corrupts on slices.

When to Apply

  • A Swift diff, feature, or PR is about to merge and needs an objective PASS/FAIL, not advisory feedback — any target: app logic, server-side Swift, CLI tools, packages.
  • An agent (Claude, Codex) authored the code and you want an independent check that it is not reproducing the classic concurrency and error-handling failure shapes (unresumed continuation branches, try? await Task.sleep posing as a cancellation check, catch blocks that throw payload-free domain cases) or hand-rolling what the compiler synthesizes (CaseIterable, Comparable, memberwise inits, definite-initialization checking).
  • Pre-concurrency or Objective-C-era Swift is being modernized and the ported surface needs auditing against current language affordances (@unknown default, rethrows, canImport, reduce(into:), count(where:), String(validating:)).

Do not apply to non-Swift codebases (the reviewer prompt's precondition aborts with "GATE NOT APPLICABLE"), or when the user wants explanations and refactors rather than a verdict. SwiftUI-specific review (state ownership, view identity, update cost, task lifecycle, lists, accessibility) is owned entirely by the sibling adversarial-swift-ui gate — this gate's rules are framework-independent and stay in scope alongside it. Rules whose remedy needs a newer toolchain than the project's are N/A, not FAIL — the reviewer prompt carries the version-gate table.

Read the full file on GitHub · 75 lines

Files

What ships with it

41 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 75 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A f68e0b90f76b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

adversarial-swift is a skill published in the GitHub repository pproenca/dot-skills (203 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 2,667 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

axiom-audit-codable

Use when the user mentions Codable review, JSON encoding/decoding issues, data serialization audit, or modernizing legacy code.

CharlesWiltgen/Axiom · 32 tokens

axiom-swift-simplifier

Use when the user wants to simplify Swift code, reduce boilerplate, or make Swift more readable and idiomatic without changing behavior.

CharlesWiltgen/Axiom · 34 tokens

kotlin-api-design

Use when designing or reviewing Kotlin function ownership, member or extension functions, factories, single-field domain types, value classes, data classes, Kotlin Multiplatform expect/actual declarations, or platform service boundaries.

chrisbanes/skills · 46 tokens

kotlin-concurrency-and-flow

Use when writing or reviewing Kotlin coroutine scope ownership, raw Thread or Executor work, init launches, non-suspending launch APIs, runBlocking, cancellation, StateFlow, SharedFlow, Channel, stateIn, SharingStarted, state updates, or one-shot events.

chrisbanes/skills · 60 tokens

coding-best-practices

Reviews Swift/iOS code for adherence to modern Swift idioms, Apple platform best practices, architecture patterns, and code quality standards. Use when user mentions best practices, code review, clean code, refactoring, or wants to improve code quality.

rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills · 55 tokens

swift-concurrency-review

Review Swift 6 strict-concurrency and SwiftUI code for idiom and build-breaking issues - non-Sendable across actor boundaries, @MainActor witness vs nonisolated protocol requirements, Combine/ObservableObject usage, force-unwraps, #Predicate macro limits, the 6.3.x Binding IRGen crash, missing #if os() guards, and…

charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev · 94 tokens