Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PracticalSwan/agent-skills --skill final-assignment-citation-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PracticalSwan/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/practicalswan/agent-skills/final-assignment-citation-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/practicalswan/agent-skills/final-assignment-citation-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/practicalswan/agent-skills/final-assignment-citation-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/practicalswan/agent-skills/final-assignment-citation-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/practicalswan/agent-skills/final-assignment-citation-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00861 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00430 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
final-assignment-citation-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Final Assignment Citation Review
Use this skill for the folder 05. Final Assignment (due Jun 19th 11AM UTC) or
for final telecom analysis deliverables.
Context Source
Load current final-assignment facts from Serena memory first. If Serena is
unavailable, use docs/memory-bank/progress.md, then verify against the current
final-assignment instructions before final advice.
Snapshot from project onboarding:
- final assignment deadline found: 2026-06-19 11:00 UTC
- telecom files contain customer, demographic, household, income, ethnicity, and credit-related fields
- materials require citations and AI-use disclosure
Workflow
- Read
AGENTS.mdand relevant Serena memory ordocs/memory-bank/fallback context. - Read current final-assignment instructions before reviewing deliverables.
- Check whether the report or notebook answers the stated business task.
- Verify cited sources support claims and are represented accurately.
- Check for AI-use disclosure when required.
- Review analytic claims for reproducibility: data source, joins, cleaning, modeling choices, evaluation metric, limitations, and recommendations.
Writing Support Boundary
Help the user improve clarity, evidence, citation, and structure. Do not ghostwrite a finished student submission unless the user explicitly asks for a draft and academic-integrity constraints permit it.
Cross-Client Portability
This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.
- GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
- Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
- Codex: install or sync the folder into
$CODEX_HOME/skills/final-assignment-citation-reviewand restart Codex after major changes.
MCP Availability And Fallback
Preferred MCP Server: None required
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed 9edc84625bac
- 6d ago Changed eff26a0b0ced
- 8d ago First seen · 90 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 3ec759634fe2
final-assignment-citation-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository PracticalSwan/agent-skills (14 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 861 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
hps-academic-paper
A review deck on compositional generalization in large language models — the field map, the gap, the evidence, and open questions. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for PI, lab group, reviewers.
html-ppt-zhangzara-vellum
A humanities lecture: how Renaissance linear perspective reshaped early cartography — sources, argument, and evidence. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for faculty, graduate seminar.
Third-Party Consents and Assignment Review
Use when identifying contractual consent, notice, change-of-control, and anti-assignment issues from M&A diligence contracts or summaries, organized into a consent tracker for attorney review.
academic-cv
Write academic CVs, cover letters, research statements, teaching philosophies, diversity statements, and prepare for academic job applications. Use this skill whenever you need to create or improve an academic CV, write a research statement, develop a teaching philosophy, prepare application materials for faculty…
argumentation-engine
Build, analyse, strengthen, and evaluate academic arguments using formal argumentation frameworks. Use this skill whenever the user needs to construct a logical argument, write a critical analysis, respond to counterarguments, evaluate the strength of evidence, identify logical fallacies, or apply argumentation models…
webnovel-review
A review aid for evaluating the quality of web-novel chapters with a separate review agent. It produces a report and writes review measurements back to the project.