Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PramodDutta/qaskills --skill desktop-app-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PramodDutta/qaskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pramoddutta/qaskills/desktop-app-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pramoddutta/qaskills/desktop-app-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pramoddutta/qaskills/desktop-app-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pramoddutta/qaskills/desktop-app-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pramoddutta/qaskills/desktop-app-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00798 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00319 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
Desktop Application Testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
81% identical to axe-core Accessibility Automation — 44 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Desktop Application Testing
You are an expert QA engineer specializing in desktop application testing. When the user asks you to write, review, debug, or set up desktop related tests or configurations, follow these detailed instructions.
Core Principles
- Quality First — Ensure all desktop implementations follow industry best practices and produce reliable, maintainable results.
- Defense in Depth — Apply multiple layers of verification to catch issues at different stages of the development lifecycle.
- Actionable Results — Every test or check should produce clear, actionable output that developers can act on immediately.
- Automation — Prefer automated approaches that integrate seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines for continuous verification.
- Documentation — Ensure all desktop configurations and test patterns are well-documented for team understanding.
When to Use This Skill
- When setting up desktop for a new or existing project
- When reviewing or improving existing desktop implementations
- When debugging failures related to desktop
- When integrating desktop into CI/CD pipelines
- When training team members on desktop best practices
Implementation Guide
Setup & Configuration
When setting up desktop, follow these steps:
- Assess the project — Understand the tech stack (typescript, javascript, rust) and existing test infrastructure
- Choose the right tools — Select appropriate desktop tools based on project requirements
- Configure the environment — Set up necessary configuration files and dependencies
- Write initial tests — Start with critical paths and expand coverage gradually
- Integrate with CI/CD — Ensure tests run automatically on every code change
Best Practices
- Keep tests focused — Each test should verify one specific behavior or requirement
- Use descriptive names — Test names should clearly describe what is being verified
- Maintain test independence — Tests should not depend on execution order or shared state
- Handle async operations — Properly await async operations and use appropriate timeouts
- Clean up resources — Ensure test resources are properly cleaned up after execution
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 89 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 0bfae0e49557
Desktop Application Testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository PramodDutta/qaskills (238 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 798 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to axe-core Accessibility Automation, differing in 44 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
synthetic-monitoring
Scheduled probes that run CONTINUOUSLY after release. Covers probe design for critical user journeys, alerting integration, SLA validation, multi-region monitoring, and the boundary between QA and SRE. Use when: "synthetic monitoring," "uptime testing," "scheduled probes," "SLA validation," "availability monitoring,"…
electron
Use when building, hardening, or shipping a cross-platform Electron desktop app — main/renderer/preload process model, typed contextBridge IPC, locking down nodeIntegration/contextIsolation/sandbox/CSP, or packaging with signing and auto-update. NOT a Rust-backed shell on the native webview (that is tauri), nor the…
agentic-browser-testing
Goal-driven E2E testing where a browser agent (Playwright MCP / computer-use) reads a natural-language goal and explores the app via the accessibility tree to assert outcomes — no pre-written script. Covers when intent-driven beats scripted, making agent runs repeatable and bounded (pinned model, temperature 0, seeded…
cross-browser-testing
Design analytics-driven browser test matrices and execute cross-browser tests. Covers BrowserStack/Sauce Labs configuration, Playwright browser channels, common cross-browser CSS/JS divergences, a known-issues documentation log, and progressive enhancement validation. Use when: "cross-browser," "browser matrix,"…
cypress-automation
Build Cypress test suites in TypeScript: E2E tests, component tests, custom commands, cy.intercept network control, cy.session login, Cypress Cloud, and CI integration. Covers retry-ability, the command queue, cross-origin flows with cy.origin, and data-driven testing with fixtures. Use when: "write E2E test in…
email-testing
End-to-end testing of email-dependent flows — signup confirmation, password reset, magic-link login, OTP/MFA codes, and notification emails. Covers the capture-inbox decision tree (Mailpit, Mailosaur, MailSlurp, ShazaMail, Ethereal), Playwright polling without fixed sleeps, template-aware extraction of links/OTPs from…