Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills --skill acceptance-criteria-given-when-thengit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pranavnagrecha/awesomesalesforceskills/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pranavnagrecha/awesomesalesforceskills/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pranavnagrecha/awesomesalesforceskills/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pranavnagrecha/awesomesalesforceskills/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pranavnagrecha/awesomesalesforceskills/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00161 | $0.03937 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00081 | $0.01969 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00787 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00394 |
Grade A, and why
acceptance-criteria-given-when-then scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/examples.md 10 KB
- references/gotchas.md 7.3 KB
- references/llm-anti-patterns.md 9.1 KB
- references/well-architected.md 3.8 KB
- scripts/check_ac_format.py 13 KB runs code
- scripts/check_acceptance_criteria_given_when_then.py 1.2 KB runs code
- templates/ac-template.md 4.4 KB
- templates/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then-template.md 2.1 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 261 lines · 161 tokens per session scan A 4e3561b43b7e
acceptance-criteria-given-when-then is a skill published in the GitHub repository PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills (17 stars, last pushed 8d ago), with no licence file. It adds 161 tokens to every session and 3,937 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
software-test-creation
Write failing tests for a TDD slice based on acceptance criteria and codebase conventions. Use when the "red" phase of red-green-refactor requires tests that define expected behavior before implementation exists. Discovers codebase test conventions first, writes test files that compile or parse but fail because the…
tdd-workflow
Drive implementation through a test-first loop: write a failing test, make it pass with the simplest change, then refactor under a green suite. Use when the user asks for TDD or test-driven development, wants tests written before the code, is adding behaviour to code that has tests, is fixing a bug and wants a…
testing-expert
Expert-level software testing with unit tests, integration tests, E2E tests, TDD/BDD, and testing best practices. Use when the user mentions TDD, BDD, unit tests, integration tests, or end-to-end tests, or when the task involves Testing Fundamentals, Unit Testing, Integration Testing, or End-to-End Testing.
test-audit
Audit test suites for T1-T4 violations using AST analysis, mock detection, and multi-stage synthesis. Invoke when user asks to audit tests, check test quality, find mock violations, review test effectiveness, or inspect test suites for over-mocking. Triggers automatic rewrites when quality gates fail.
bdd-mathematical-verification
BDD-Driven Mathematical Content Verification Skill Combines Behavior-Driven Development with mathematical formula extraction, verification, and transformation using: Cucumber/Gherkin for specification RSpec for implementation verification mathpix-gem for LaTeX/mathematical content extraction Pattern matching on syntax…
test-driven-development
TDD workflow — Red, Green, Refactor cycle with practical examples.