Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add prasad-vennam/Awesome-Android-AI-Agent-Skills --skill android-code-review-expertgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/prasad-vennam/Awesome-Android-AI-Agent-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/prasad-vennam/awesome-android-ai-agent-skills/android-code-review-expert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prasad-vennam/awesome-android-ai-agent-skills/android-code-review-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prasad-vennam/awesome-android-ai-agent-skills/android-code-review-expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prasad-vennam/awesome-android-ai-agent-skills/android-code-review-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prasad-vennam/awesome-android-ai-agent-skills/android-code-review-expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01061 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00531 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00212 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
android-code-review-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Android Code Review Excellence 🧐🛡️
A rigorous framework for AI agents and developers to perform high-quality, professional Android code reviews.
⚡ When to Use
- PR Review: Analyzing a Pull Request for logic, style, and regressions.
- Pre-commit Audit: Self-checking code before pushing.
- Architectural Check: Ensuring new features follow the established team patterns.
- Security Audit: Spotting sensitive data exposure or insecure networking.
- Performance Audit: Detecting potential memory leaks or UI jank.
🏗️ Review Checklist
1. Architecture & Design
- Clean Architecture: Is logic properly separated into Domain/Data/Presentation?
- State Flow: Does the ViewModel expose
StateFlow? Is state properly hoisted? - Dependency Injection: Are dependencies injected via Hilt/Koin? No manual
new Class()for dependencies. - Manifest Scaffolding: Are required permissions (like
INTERNETfor Coil/Retrofit) actually defined? Is the@HiltAndroidAppclass correctly designated inAndroidManifest.xmlviaandroid:name? - Type-Safe Navigation: Is the app using Compose
NavHostwith Kotlin Serialization (type-safe routes) instead of anti-pattern manual state swapping? - Modularity: Is the code placed in the correct module?
2. Jetpack Compose (UI)
- Recomposition: Are there expensive calculations inside
@Composable? Useremember. - Previews: Does the new component have
@Previewfor light/dark mode and accessibility? - Stability: Are domain models marked
@Stableor@Immutable? - Material 3: Is the code using the theme's
MaterialTheme.colorSchemeinstead of hardcoded hex values? - Theme Bridge: If XML resources are used (e.g.
res/), is the Material Components XML Bridge correctly set up in themes?
3. Stability & Networking
- Error Handling: Are network calls wrapped in
Resultortry/catchwith proper UI feedback? - Coroutine Scopes: Use
viewModelScopefor ViewModels andlifecycleScopefor Fragments/Activities. - Flow Lifecycle: Is
collectAsStateWithLifecycle()used instead of basecollectAsState()? (Critical for avoiding resource leaks when the app goes into the background). - Room TypeConverters: If caching domain models with complex definitions (e.g.
LocalDateTime,List<String>), did you verify a@TypeConverteris written and registered on the Database? ROOM WILL CRASH without this.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 96 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 4ef2f9b3a66a
android-code-review-expert is a skill published in the GitHub repository prasad-vennam/Awesome-Android-AI-Agent-Skills (9 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,061 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
swift-concurrency-pro
Reviews Swift code for concurrency correctness, modern API usage, and common async/await pitfalls. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing Swift concurrency code.
swiftui-pro
Comprehensively reviews SwiftUI code for best practices on modern APIs, maintainability, and performance. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing SwiftUI projects.
audit
Use when the user wants a code review on recent changes — quality, spec, security, or performance feedback. Triggers a multi-level (L1-L5) review with a standalone Reviewer; on NEEDSFIX, offers to apply findings via /hyperflow:plan. Trigger with /hyperflow:audit, "review this change", "review my PR", "audit the diff"…
mobile-platform-offline-validate
Review a Lightning Web Component for mobile offline compatibility — the Komaci offline static analyzer that pre-primes the data graph for Salesforce Mobile App Plus and Field Service Mobile App. Produces a finding list with code-level fixes covering inline GraphQL queries in @wire configurations, modern lwc:if /…
stage-coach
Consume CocoSentinel per-stage external coach requests and produce stage quality scores.
mobiai-review-code
Use when reviewing mobile code changes — check for lifecycle issues, memory leaks, thread safety, and platform-specific pitfalls.