android-code-review-expert

android-code-review-expert is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from prasad-vennam/Awesome-Android-AI-Agent-Skills. It costs 28 tokens per session (1,061 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A checklist for reviewing Android pull requests and other code changes, with attention to architecture, security, memory use, performance, and user-interface quality. A pull request is a proposed code change submitted for review before it is merged.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing Android pull requests, auditing changes before commit, checking architecture and dependency injection, and looking for security, performance, or Compose UI issues.
Why use it?
It provides consistent checks for regressions, leaks, insecure data handling, UI problems, and departures from the project’s design patterns. It can also guide a developer’s own review before committing code.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Reviewing Android pull requests, auditing changes before commit, checking architecture and dependency injection, and looking for security, performance, or Compose UI issues.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/prasad-vennam/awesome-android-ai-agent-skills/android-code-review-expert
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add prasad-vennam/Awesome-Android-AI-Agent-Skills --skill android-code-review-expert
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/prasad-vennam/Awesome-Android-AI-Agent-Skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for android-code-review-expert

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prasad-vennam/awesome-android-ai-agent-skills/android-code-review-expert/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/prasad-vennam/awesome-android-ai-agent-skills/android-code-review-expert)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prasad-vennam/awesome-android-ai-agent-skills/android-code-review-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prasad-vennam/awesome-android-ai-agent-skills/android-code-review-expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for android-code-review-expert

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prasad-vennam/awesome-android-ai-agent-skills/android-code-review-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prasad-vennam/awesome-android-ai-agent-skills/android-code-review-expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 28 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,061 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00028 $0.01061
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00531
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00212
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00106

Measured 11d ago against content hash 4ef2f9b3a66a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

android-code-review-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/android-code-review-expert/SKILL.md · 96 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Android Code Review Excellence 🧐🛡️

A rigorous framework for AI agents and developers to perform high-quality, professional Android code reviews.

⚡ When to Use

  • PR Review: Analyzing a Pull Request for logic, style, and regressions.
  • Pre-commit Audit: Self-checking code before pushing.
  • Architectural Check: Ensuring new features follow the established team patterns.
  • Security Audit: Spotting sensitive data exposure or insecure networking.
  • Performance Audit: Detecting potential memory leaks or UI jank.

🏗️ Review Checklist

1. Architecture & Design

  • Clean Architecture: Is logic properly separated into Domain/Data/Presentation?
  • State Flow: Does the ViewModel expose StateFlow? Is state properly hoisted?
  • Dependency Injection: Are dependencies injected via Hilt/Koin? No manual new Class() for dependencies.
  • Manifest Scaffolding: Are required permissions (like INTERNET for Coil/Retrofit) actually defined? Is the @HiltAndroidApp class correctly designated in AndroidManifest.xml via android:name?
  • Type-Safe Navigation: Is the app using Compose NavHost with Kotlin Serialization (type-safe routes) instead of anti-pattern manual state swapping?
  • Modularity: Is the code placed in the correct module?

2. Jetpack Compose (UI)

  • Recomposition: Are there expensive calculations inside @Composable? Use remember.
  • Previews: Does the new component have @Preview for light/dark mode and accessibility?
  • Stability: Are domain models marked @Stable or @Immutable?
  • Material 3: Is the code using the theme's MaterialTheme.colorScheme instead of hardcoded hex values?
  • Theme Bridge: If XML resources are used (e.g. res/), is the Material Components XML Bridge correctly set up in themes?

3. Stability & Networking

  • Error Handling: Are network calls wrapped in Result or try/catch with proper UI feedback?
  • Coroutine Scopes: Use viewModelScope for ViewModels and lifecycleScope for Fragments/Activities.
  • Flow Lifecycle: Is collectAsStateWithLifecycle() used instead of base collectAsState()? (Critical for avoiding resource leaks when the app goes into the background).
  • Room TypeConverters: If caching domain models with complex definitions (e.g. LocalDateTime, List<String>), did you verify a @TypeConverter is written and registered on the Database? ROOM WILL CRASH without this.

Read the full file on GitHub · 96 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 96 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 4ef2f9b3a66a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

android-code-review-expert is a skill published in the GitHub repository prasad-vennam/Awesome-Android-AI-Agent-Skills (9 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,061 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

swift-concurrency-pro

Reviews Swift code for concurrency correctness, modern API usage, and common async/await pitfalls. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing Swift concurrency code.

jacklandrin/OnlySwitch · 35 tokens

swiftui-pro

Comprehensively reviews SwiftUI code for best practices on modern APIs, maintainability, and performance. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing SwiftUI projects.

jacklandrin/OnlySwitch · 36 tokens

audit

Use when the user wants a code review on recent changes — quality, spec, security, or performance feedback. Triggers a multi-level (L1-L5) review with a standalone Reviewer; on NEEDSFIX, offers to apply findings via /hyperflow:plan. Trigger with /hyperflow:audit, "review this change", "review my PR", "audit the diff"…

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace · 84 tokens

mobile-platform-offline-validate

Review a Lightning Web Component for mobile offline compatibility — the Komaci offline static analyzer that pre-primes the data graph for Salesforce Mobile App Plus and Field Service Mobile App. Produces a finding list with code-level fixes covering inline GraphQL queries in @wire configurations, modern lwc:if /…

forcedotcom/sf-skills · 207 tokens

stage-coach

Consume CocoSentinel per-stage external coach requests and produce stage quality scores.

Snowflake-Labs/cocoplus · 19 tokens

mobiai-review-code

Use when reviewing mobile code changes — check for lifecycle issues, memory leaks, thread safety, and platform-specific pitfalls.

ArisGuimera/MobiAI-Core · 28 tokens