Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Prat011/awesome-llm-skills --skill webapp-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Prat011/awesome-llm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/prat011/awesome-llm-skills/webapp-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prat011/awesome-llm-skills/webapp-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prat011/awesome-llm-skills/webapp-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prat011/awesome-llm-skills/webapp-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prat011/awesome-llm-skills/webapp-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00884 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00442 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00177 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
webapp-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 96 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 51b7349e77ec
webapp-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository Prat011/awesome-llm-skills (1,729 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 884 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
agent-browser
Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.
webapp-testing
Verify a web application works correctly in a real browser using Playwright. Covers page navigation, form submission, user interactions, console error detection, screenshot capture, and responsive layout checking. Use when you need to confirm a UI feature actually works end-to-end, catch regressions after a change…
shipkit-qa-visual
Visual QA using Playwright as a browser automation library. --setup installs Playwright and creates ui-goals.json; default mode writes inline scripts to navigate, screenshot, and report against goals.
playwright-cli
Automate browser interactions, test web pages and work with Playwright tests.
acceptance-orchestrator
Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.