agentmods.dev

teak: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/no-comments/SKILL.md

no-comments is a skill for Claude Code from praveenjuge/teak. It costs 20 tokens per session (641 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of no-comments, MIT.

A code-review skill that checks comments in the current files or change set and removes comments that do not explain an external constraint. It also reviews certain lint and type-suppression comments.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing a working-tree or branch diff, acting on accepted findings, and keeping only comments required by contracts, external systems, or other stated exceptions.
Why use it?
It helps prevent stale, misleading, or workaround comments from hiding unclear code or unresolved problems.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents; mentions Claude Code; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is praveenjuge/teak's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on teak itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything teak configures →

not rated 24repo +1 yesterday A scan 20 tokens copy · 88% MIT
View source ↗ praveenjuge/teak teakvault.com
Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to praveenjuge/teak. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/praveenjuge/teak/main/.agents/skills/no-comments/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/praveenjuge/teak

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for no-comments

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/praveenjuge/teak/no-comments/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/praveenjuge/teak/no-comments)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/praveenjuge/teak/no-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/praveenjuge/teak/no-comments/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for no-comments

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/praveenjuge/teak/no-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/praveenjuge/teak/no-comments.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 641 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 88% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.00641
Opus 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00256
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00128
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00064

Measured 5d ago against content hash 52e05eb2578f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

no-comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

88% identical to no-comments — 8 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/no-comments/SKILL.md · 27 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 27 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

No comments

In Claude Code, read the Claude Code adapter once per session before you follow this skill. It maps the Cursor names in pstack skills to Claude Code.

Spawn Comment Sicko. Act on accepted findings.

Defer to Comment Sicko's fresh perspective.

Scope

Use the caller's files or diff. Otherwise use the current diff against the base branch, default main, including the working tree.

Steps

  1. Spawn Task with subagent_type: "comment-sicko". Pass the scope. Pick each subagent's reasoning level and fast or standard speed for the job, per the Subagents section of the poteto-mode skill. Do not restate its rules.
  2. Inspect its report and diff. Reject application-code edits, scope escapes, exception-protected deletions, misstated MUST KILL reasons, and flags that treat kept intentional code as guilty. Reshape flags on our-code surprises stay actionable. Do not restore those comments. A keep survives only with proof it is about something we cannot change. Audit missed scoped lint and TypeScript suppressions. Correctness or safety suppressions stay actionable MUST KILLs. Restore deletions only with exact exceptions and scoped proof. Before accepting thin IMPORTANT or do not remove kills or keeps, run /how or /why on their symbol. If a kill is ambiguous, do not restore. If a keep is refuted or still ambiguous, delete it. Revert and rerun one rejected report with the failure named. Reject a second, report it open, and fail /no-comments.
  3. Fix trivial accepted flags directly by deleting a dead path, dropping a parameter, or using the real API. If any fix needs a shape, run /architect once for the accepted set and surrounding code. Stop at the sketch. Architect shapes. Step 4 implements.
  4. Implement the smallest root-cause fix in scope. Remove every named workaround. If the root cause is out of scope, land the smallest in-scope fix and report the rest open. The principle-fix-root-causes and principle-redesign-from-first-principles skills guide intent only. Neither authorizes widening the fence nor fixing instances outside it. Never bolt on symptom guards.
  5. Constraint comments say do not remove, do not change wording, or talk to X before changing. Leave keeps about things we cannot change. Offer the cheapest in-scope type, runtime, test, or CI lint. Wait for interactive approval. Unattended and eval require caller pre-approval. If approved, encode then delete. Otherwise delete, report the constraint open, and sketch out-of-scope work.
  6. Report the deletion count, restored comments, reruns, architect sketch, fixes, encoding offers, encodings, unenforced constraints, and other open work.

Read the full file on GitHub · 27 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 27 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 52e05eb2578f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

no-comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository praveenjuge/teak (24 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 641 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to no-comments, differing in 8 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Code reviewbookmark-managerbrowser-extensionelectronexpoknowledge-basemcp
Related

no-comments compared with skills from other repositories

no-comments next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
no-commentspraveenjuge/teakSkill24yesterdayMITA20Claude Code
act-on-feedbackmicrosoft/vscodeSkill195kyesterdayMITA31Claude Code, Codex
update-prmicrosoft/vscodeSkill195kyesterdayMITA26Claude Code, Codex
impl-validatorAr9av/obsidian-wikiSkill3.7kyesterdayMITA38Claude Code
search-docselie222/rakazoSkill7.2kyesterdayApache-2.0A28Claude Code, Codex
say-helloelie222/rakazoSkill7.2kyesterdayApache-2.0A31Claude Code, Codex
winui-code-reviewmicrosoft/winappCliSkill1.4kyesterdayMITA69Claude Code