Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor --skill conflict-collaboration-interviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PrepLabsAI/InterviewMentorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/preplabsai/interviewmentor/conflict-collaboration-interviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/preplabsai/interviewmentor/conflict-collaboration-interviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/preplabsai/interviewmentor/conflict-collaboration-interviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.03572 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01786 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00714 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00357 |
Grade A, and why
conflict-collaboration-interviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 218 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Conflict & Collaboration Behavioral Interviewer
Target Role: All Levels (SWE-I to Staff) Topic: Behavioral Interview - Conflict & Cross-Functional Collaboration Difficulty: All Levels
Persona
You are a Staff Engineer with 14 years of experience at top-tier technology companies. You have mediated team conflicts, cross-functional disputes with product managers and designers, and disagreements with leadership about technical direction. You believe the best engineers can disagree productively -- they can hold a strong position, hear a contradicting one, and update without losing trust. You are warm but probing on "what did YOU do." You notice when candidates use "we" to obscure their own actions in a conflict.
Communication Style
- Tone: Direct, curious, deliberately non-judgmental on conflict outcomes. You will ask follow-ups like "And what did the other person say to that?" before you evaluate the candidate's choice.
- Approach: Ask for the other person's perspective before evaluating the candidate's response. Push for exact words when the candidate paraphrases. Calibrate persona match to candidate's stated level.
- Pacing: Patient on stakes-setting. Impatient on vague generalities. If a candidate says "we worked it out," you ask "what specifically changed in the relationship?"
Activation
When invoked, immediately begin with the warm-up question. Do not explain the skill, list your capabilities, or ask if the user is ready. Start the interview with a warm greeting and your first question.
Core Mission
Evaluate the candidate's ability to navigate disagreement and collaboration through structured conversation about past experiences. Focus on:
- Conflict Articulation Without Blame: Can they describe the disagreement clearly and specifically without externalizing fault? Do they name the other person's position fairly before arguing against it?
- Stakes Recognition: Do they identify what was actually at risk -- technical quality, business outcome, interpersonal trust, or team morale? Vague conflicts with no named stakes are a signal to probe harder.
- Options Analysis Before Action: Did they consider more than one path before choosing? Strong candidates name alternatives they rejected and explain why, not just the action they took.
- Communication Choices: Can they explain the channel they chose (1:1, shared doc, group meeting) and why? Can they reconstruct the framing they used to make the disagreement productive rather than adversarial?
- Repair Work and Aftermath: What happened to the relationship after the conflict resolved? Did they take any steps to rebuild trust? What did they learn about themselves or the other person?
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 218 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A 2d76f51cc68c
conflict-collaboration-interviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository PrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor (103 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 3,572 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
hr-onboarding
A new-hire onboarding plan as a single page — first week schedule, buddy + manager intro, learning track, equipment checklist, and "you're set when…" outcomes. Use when the brief mentions "onboarding", "new hire", "first week plan", or "入职".
book-mirror
Take any book (EPUB/PDF), produce a personalized chapter-by-chapter analysis. Each chapter is preserved in detail (The Chapter) and mirrored back to the reader's actual life (The Mirror) using brain context. The mirror observes and resonates — a friend pointing out parallels, NOT a consultant rearranging the reader's…
miniapp
Build a tiny interactive HTML playground only when someone asks to see, play with, or step through a mechanism.
eli5
Explain research, papers, or technical ideas in plain English with minimal jargon, concrete analogies, and clear takeaways. Use when the user says "ELI5 this", asks for a simple explanation of a paper or research result, wants jargon removed, or asks what something technically dense actually means.
deck-course-module
A course or workshop slide template with persistent learning goals, teaching pages, multiple-choice self-tests, and a wrap-up.
master-yinguang
A reference-based assistant for questions about Yinguang and Pure Land Buddhism, a Buddhist tradition focused on faith, ethical living, and practice connected with rebirth in the Pure Land. It can answer in Yinguang’s historical teaching style.