spk-meta-skill-authoring

spk-meta-skill-authoring is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty. It costs 35 tokens per session (200 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for creating and revising Spec Kitty skills, including their names, categories, boundaries, and tests.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when adding, renaming, revising, or testing the public set of Spec Kitty skills.
Why use it?
It helps keep the available skills organised and prevents skill instructions from being mixed with slash-command files or project doctrine.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it when adding, renaming, revising, or testing the public set of Spec Kitty skills.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/priivacy-ai/spec-kitty/spk-meta-skill-authoring
About the project

Spec Kitty is an open-source command-line tool that turns product requirements into a repository-based workflow for AI-assisted software development. It stores specifications, plans, tasks, acceptance criteria, reviews, and merge decisions in Git while giving agents isolated git worktrees for parallel implementation. The catalogue add-ons support the project's workflows for coordinating agents and governing their work.

Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty · 1,603 stars · on GitHub · spec-kitty.ai

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty --skill spk-meta-skill-authoring
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for spk-meta-skill-authoring

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/priivacy-ai/spec-kitty/spk-meta-skill-authoring/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/priivacy-ai/spec-kitty/spk-meta-skill-authoring)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/priivacy-ai/spec-kitty/spk-meta-skill-authoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/priivacy-ai/spec-kitty/spk-meta-skill-authoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for spk-meta-skill-authoring

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/priivacy-ai/spec-kitty/spk-meta-skill-authoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/priivacy-ai/spec-kitty/spk-meta-skill-authoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 35 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 200 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00035 $0.00200
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00100
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00040
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00020

Measured 12d ago against content hash cc28813302d8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

spk-meta-skill-authoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

src/charter/offering/skills/spk-meta-skill-authoring/SKILL.md · 25 lines

What it actually says

spk-meta-skill-authoring

Use this skill when creating or revising a Spec Kitty skill.

Rules

  1. Name public operating skills spk-<family>-<action-or-topic>.
  2. Keep generated slash-command files separate from generated spec-kitty.<command> Agent Skills.
  3. Preserve legacy spec-kitty-* skills when they remain useful aliases or detailed workflows.
  4. Keep mission behavior in doctrine mission composition, not in skill prose.
  5. Add tests when changing the public skill inventory.

Families

Use only established families unless a new family improves discovery: start, mission, run, gate, admin, team, doctrine, integrate, or meta.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 25 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A cc28813302d8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

spk-meta-skill-authoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty (1,603 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 200 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.