Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add prime-radiant-inc/greenfield --skill validation-methodologygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/prime-radiant-inc/greenfieldWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/prime-radiant-inc/greenfield/validation-methodology)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prime-radiant-inc/greenfield/validation-methodology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prime-radiant-inc/greenfield/validation-methodology/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prime-radiant-inc/greenfield/validation-methodology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prime-radiant-inc/greenfield/validation-methodology.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.02621 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01311 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00524 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00262 |
Grade A, and why
validation-methodology scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 252 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Validation Methodology
Specifications are claims. Claims require proof. This skill defines how the pipeline transforms claims into proof.
Acceptance Criteria Format
Every module spec receives formal acceptance criteria during Layer 4. Criteria use Given/When/Then format:
### AC-CONFIG-001: Config File Load
**Given** a valid config file exists at the documented path
**When** the application starts
**Then**
- The application reads every declared key from the file
- Unknown keys are logged as warnings, not errors
- Missing optional keys fall back to documented defaults
**Source:** official-docs, source-code, runtime-observation
**Confidence:** confirmed
**Priority:** P0
**Verification:** Automated test
ID Format: AC-{DOMAIN}-{NNN}
{DOMAIN}: Short uppercase token for the behavioral domain (matches the spec's domain tokens — e.g.,CLI,CONFIG,API,AUDIO,PARSER){NNN}: Zero-padded three-digit sequence (001, 002, ...)- IDs are immutable — retired, never reused
Field Rules
Given/When/Then:
- Use observable terms, not implementation details
- "Given a valid config file exists" not "Given the ConfigLoader is initialized"
- Each Then outcome must be verifiable without implementation internals
- Describe observable state, not UI mechanisms — "system rejects malformed input" not "error banner is visible." Criteria must be testable across any frontend platform.
Priority:
- P0: Must pass. Blocks pipeline. Implementation cannot ship without satisfying.
- P1: Should pass. Reported as warnings. Divergence requires documented rationale.
- P2: Nice to pass. Advisory.
Verification: One of the 5 methods below.
Output Location
workspace/raw/specs/validation/acceptance-criteria/
_index.md # Summary with counts and links
config-loading.md # AC-CONFIG-001 through AC-CONFIG-NNN
cli-flags.md # AC-CLI-001 through ...
...
Verification Methods
Every acceptance criterion specifies how the implementer will verify it:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 252 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 673fb08b5ecf
validation-methodology is a skill published in the GitHub repository prime-radiant-inc/greenfield (273 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 2,621 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
write-test-plans
Interactive workflow for writing new Speky test plans for requirements lacking coverage, guided by the Speky MCP server.
speky-workflow
Guidelines for working with Speky requirements and tests via the speky MCP server tools.
live-preview
Mid-build visual verification loop. Takes screenshots of components during construction, not just after. Catches visual regressions and invisible features before they compound. Requires Playwright or similar screenshot tool.
validate-album
Validates album directory structure, file locations, and content integrity. Use before release or whenever the user wants to check an album's structural health.
api-testing
HTTP API testing for TypeScript (Supertest) and Python (httpx, pytest). Test REST APIs, GraphQL, request/response validation, authentication, and error handling.
bun-jest-migration
Use when migrating from Jest to Bun's test runner, import compatibility, mocks, and config.