validation-methodology

validation-methodology is a skill for Claude Code from prime-radiant-inc/greenfield. It costs 33 tokens per session (2,621 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A shared method for turning requirements into testable statements and completion checklists. It uses Given/When/Then steps and records how each claim will be verified.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to define acceptance criteria, quality gates, definitions of done, and automated or manual checks for software changes.
Why use it?
It prevents vague requirements and unfinished work from being treated as complete. Each expected result must have evidence and a verification method.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the greenfield plugin — 22 skills, 2 commands, 2 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to define acceptance criteria, quality gates, definitions of done, and automated or manual checks for software changes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/prime-radiant-inc/greenfield/validation-methodology
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add prime-radiant-inc/greenfield --skill validation-methodology
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/prime-radiant-inc/greenfield

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install greenfield, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 22 skills, 2 commands, 2 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for validation-methodology

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prime-radiant-inc/greenfield/validation-methodology/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/prime-radiant-inc/greenfield/validation-methodology)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prime-radiant-inc/greenfield/validation-methodology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prime-radiant-inc/greenfield/validation-methodology/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for validation-methodology

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prime-radiant-inc/greenfield/validation-methodology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prime-radiant-inc/greenfield/validation-methodology.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 33 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,621 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00033 $0.02621
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.01311
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00524
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00262

Measured 9d ago against content hash 673fb08b5ecf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

validation-methodology scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/validation-methodology/SKILL.md · 252 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 252 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Validation Methodology

Specifications are claims. Claims require proof. This skill defines how the pipeline transforms claims into proof.

Acceptance Criteria Format

Every module spec receives formal acceptance criteria during Layer 4. Criteria use Given/When/Then format:

### AC-CONFIG-001: Config File Load
**Given** a valid config file exists at the documented path
**When** the application starts
**Then**
- The application reads every declared key from the file
- Unknown keys are logged as warnings, not errors
- Missing optional keys fall back to documented defaults

**Source:** official-docs, source-code, runtime-observation
**Confidence:** confirmed
**Priority:** P0
**Verification:** Automated test

ID Format: AC-{DOMAIN}-{NNN}

  • {DOMAIN}: Short uppercase token for the behavioral domain (matches the spec's domain tokens — e.g., CLI, CONFIG, API, AUDIO, PARSER)
  • {NNN}: Zero-padded three-digit sequence (001, 002, ...)
  • IDs are immutable — retired, never reused

Field Rules

Given/When/Then:

  • Use observable terms, not implementation details
  • "Given a valid config file exists" not "Given the ConfigLoader is initialized"
  • Each Then outcome must be verifiable without implementation internals
  • Describe observable state, not UI mechanisms — "system rejects malformed input" not "error banner is visible." Criteria must be testable across any frontend platform.

Priority:

  • P0: Must pass. Blocks pipeline. Implementation cannot ship without satisfying.
  • P1: Should pass. Reported as warnings. Divergence requires documented rationale.
  • P2: Nice to pass. Advisory.

Verification: One of the 5 methods below.

Output Location

workspace/raw/specs/validation/acceptance-criteria/
    _index.md                   # Summary with counts and links
    config-loading.md           # AC-CONFIG-001 through AC-CONFIG-NNN
    cli-flags.md                # AC-CLI-001 through ...
    ...

Verification Methods

Every acceptance criterion specifies how the implementer will verify it:

Read the full file on GitHub · 252 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 252 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 673fb08b5ecf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

validation-methodology is a skill published in the GitHub repository prime-radiant-inc/greenfield (273 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 2,621 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.