Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/primeintellect-ai/verifiers/evaluate-environmentsnpx skills add PrimeIntellect-ai/verifiers --skill evaluate-environmentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PrimeIntellect-ai/verifiersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/primeintellect-ai/verifiers/evaluate-environments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/primeintellect-ai/verifiers/evaluate-environments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/primeintellect-ai/verifiers/evaluate-environments.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01721 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00860 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00344 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00172 |
Grade A, and why
evaluate-environments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 209 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evaluate Tasksets
Goal
Set up an evaluation for a taskset in the correct way to reproduce results from others or evaluate a model and harness combination on a given taskset.
Canonical path
Use the eval entrypoint
uv run eval <MY_ENV>
Core workflow
- Resolve and validate config without model calls:
uv run eval <MY_ENV> --dry-run
- Run model-free gold validation when the taskset implements
validate:
uv run validate <MY_ENV> --runtime.type subprocess
- Do a small run to see whether it works correctly:
uv run eval <MY_ENV> -m deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash -n 3 -r 1
- Inspect successful, zero-reward, and errored traces.
- Scale only after task loading, harness capability, runtime lifecycle, and scoring are correct.
When the user requests a full run, do not restrict the number of tasks. Ask for the appropriate harness to use (if not specified)
IDs and plugin resolution
A plugin id names an installed package (e.g. my-taskset); verifiers imports it and never installs anything itself.
The leading ID is shorthand for --env.taskset.id. A harness belongs to an agent — --env.agent.harness.* on the single-agent env, --env.<agent>.harness.* on a multi-agent one (there is no run-level --harness.*):
uv run eval my-task-v1 --env.agent.harness.id codex --env.agent.runtime.type prime
The env — the control flow between agents — owns the whole [env] block. Empty --env.id
keeps the taskset's own story (its exported Env subclass, else the single-agent
env); --env.id pairs a reusable env with any taskset, its knobs typed under --env.*:
uv run eval my-task-v1 --env.id best-of-n --env.n 8 # pass@k / rejection sampling
uv run eval my-task-v1 --env.id agentic-judge \
--env.judge.runtime.type docker # a judge agent verifies each attempt in a sandbox
Disabling tools
Almost every harness comes with a disabled_tools list, which can be used to disable one or multiple tools:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 209 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 90542651f22f
evaluate-environments is a skill published in the GitHub repository PrimeIntellect-ai/verifiers (4,577 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,721 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…