Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/prisma/prisma-next/prisma-next-feedbacknpx skills add prisma/prisma-next --skill prisma-next-feedbackgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/prisma/prisma-nextWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/prisma/prisma-next/prisma-next-feedback)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prisma/prisma-next/prisma-next-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prisma/prisma-next/prisma-next-feedback.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00161 | $0.04108 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00081 | $0.02054 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00822 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00411 |
Grade A, and why
prisma-next-feedback scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 256 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Prisma Next — Feedback (Bug Reports, Feature Requests, Team Q&A)
Edit your data contract. Prisma handles the rest.
This skill is the terminal of the capability-gap routing pattern. Every other Prisma Next skill's What Prisma Next doesn't do yet entries route here when the user wants the gap closed; the skill also fires directly on prompts like "this is a bug", "file an issue", "feature request", "can I ask the team about this?", "how should I integrate X with Prisma Next?".
The skill's job is to pick the right channel — GitHub issue or Discord — and then either produce a structured, public-safe issue body (no secrets, no proprietary schema) the framework team can act on, or hand the user a direct link to the Prisma Discord for synchronous Q&A. Submission to GitHub never happens without explicit user confirmation.
Canonical channels:
- GitHub Issues (bugs + concrete feature requests): https://github.com/prisma/prisma-next/issues/new/choose
- Prisma Discord (Q&A, design feedback, direct team contact — including extension authors): https://pris.ly/discord
When to Use
- A capability-gap entry from another
prisma-next-*skill fired and the user said "yes, file the feature request". - User says "this is a bug", "file this", "report this", "file an issue against PN", "send feedback", "this should be a feature".
- User describes an unexpected behaviour — wrong exit code, error message that didn't match what happened, type signature that doesn't match runtime behaviour, planner refused a migration that looked safe — and wants it on the framework team's radar.
- User asks "can I ask the Prisma team about this?", "is there somewhere I can talk to the team?", "is this the intended way to do X?", "how should I integrate <my extension / my tool> with PN?", or any other open-ended Q&A or design-feedback prompt — including extension authors asking integration questions.
When Not to Use
- User wants to fix the bug themselves in the user's own code. The fix lives in another skill (debug / contract / migrations / queries / runtime / build). Chain to the right skill first; only fall back to feedback if the user explicitly wants the framework to do something differently.
- User wants to upgrade Prisma Next (the bug may already be fixed) → the
prisma-next-upgradeskill (separately installed); this skill mentions it as a pre-flight check. - The user's question is already covered by a workflow skill in the cluster ("how do I add a column?" →
prisma-next-contract; "what's the right query interface?" →prisma-next-queries). Route to the workflow skill, not to the team — load the skill, answer the question, and only escalate to Discord if the agent can't.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 256 lines · 161 tokens per session scan A b21735ebad6b
prisma-next-feedback is a skill published in the GitHub repository prisma/prisma-next (419 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 161 tokens to every session and 4,108 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-pr
Creates a GitHub PR with a Linear-ticket-prefixed title and a decision-led, narrative description for prisma-next. Use when the user wants to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review.
draft-release-notes
Author the committed release-notes file for a Prisma 8 release (stable or 8.0.0-rc.N) by enumerating the merged PRs since the previous release v tag (stable or -rc.N), resolving opaque TML-NNNN: titles via Linear context (never copied verbatim), triaging public-worthiness, and writing categorized notes — breaking…
record-upgrade-instructions
Record upgrade instructions alongside a Prisma Next breaking-change PR, so downstream consumers (users of @internal/ and authors of Prisma Next extensions) can apply the matching code translation automatically via the published upgrade skills. Use when you have refactored framework code and the test suite went red in…
triage-contributor-pr
Triage open pull requests from external contributors to prisma/prisma and produce a per-PR verdict with evidence. Use when a maintainer asks to triage, evaluate, assess, or review the queue of incoming contributor PRs, to decide whether a fork PR is safe to run CI on, to check whether a PR is in scope for its version…
contrib-pr
Open a high-quality external contributor PR against prisma/orm. Use when the user is an outside contributor (not a Prisma maintainer) and wants to submit a change as a pull request from a fork. Encodes the contribution flow from CONTRIBUTING.md so the resulting PR passes review on the first round.
github-review-iteration
Orchestrates a GitHub PR review loop by delegating triage and implementation to dedicated sub-agents, then repeating until actionable review items are cleared. Use when the user says “address PR review”, “triage review comments”, or “iterate until review is clean”.