Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add prisma/prisma-next --skill prisma-next-feedbackgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/prisma/prisma-nextWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/prisma/prisma-next/prisma-next-feedback)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prisma/prisma-next/prisma-next-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prisma/prisma-next/prisma-next-feedback/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prisma/prisma-next/prisma-next-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prisma/prisma-next/prisma-next-feedback.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00161 | $0.04108 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00064 | $0.01643 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00822 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00411 |
Grade A, and why
prisma-next-feedback scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 256 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Prisma Next — Feedback (Bug Reports, Feature Requests, Team Q&A)
Edit your data contract. Prisma handles the rest.
This skill is the terminal of the capability-gap routing pattern. Every other Prisma Next skill's What Prisma Next doesn't do yet entries route here when the user wants the gap closed; the skill also fires directly on prompts like "this is a bug", "file an issue", "feature request", "can I ask the team about this?", "how should I integrate X with Prisma Next?".
The skill's job is to pick the right channel — GitHub issue or Discord — and then either produce a structured, public-safe issue body (no secrets, no proprietary schema) the framework team can act on, or hand the user a direct link to the Prisma Discord for synchronous Q&A. Submission to GitHub never happens without explicit user confirmation.
Canonical channels:
- GitHub Issues (bugs + concrete feature requests): https://github.com/prisma/prisma-next/issues/new/choose
- Prisma Discord (Q&A, design feedback, direct team contact — including extension authors): https://pris.ly/discord
When to Use
- A capability-gap entry from another
prisma-next-*skill fired and the user said "yes, file the feature request". - User says "this is a bug", "file this", "report this", "file an issue against PN", "send feedback", "this should be a feature".
- User describes an unexpected behaviour — wrong exit code, error message that didn't match what happened, type signature that doesn't match runtime behaviour, planner refused a migration that looked safe — and wants it on the framework team's radar.
- User asks "can I ask the Prisma team about this?", "is there somewhere I can talk to the team?", "is this the intended way to do X?", "how should I integrate <my extension / my tool> with PN?", or any other open-ended Q&A or design-feedback prompt — including extension authors asking integration questions.
When Not to Use
- User wants to fix the bug themselves in the user's own code. The fix lives in another skill (debug / contract / migrations / queries / runtime / build). Chain to the right skill first; only fall back to feedback if the user explicitly wants the framework to do something differently.
- User wants to upgrade Prisma Next (the bug may already be fixed) → the
prisma-next-upgradeskill (separately installed); this skill mentions it as a pre-flight check. - The user's question is already covered by a workflow skill in the cluster ("how do I add a column?" →
prisma-next-contract; "what's the right query interface?" →prisma-next-queries). Route to the workflow skill, not to the team — load the skill, answer the question, and only escalate to Discord if the agent can't.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 256 lines · 161 tokens per session scan A b21735ebad6b
prisma-next-feedback is a skill published in the GitHub repository prisma/prisma-next (414 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 161 tokens to every session and 4,108 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Optimize the meaningful UI available immediately from a Next.js route on an initial load (hard navigation) or named client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route and entry point at a time; the shipped test then guards…