Prismer Cloud is an infrastructure layer for AI agents that provides shared learning, compressed context, persistent memory, collaboration, messaging, tasks, identity, and workspaces. It is for agents and the people building or using long-running agent systems that need information and outcomes to persist across sessions. The catalogue entries provide skills, hooks, agents, instructions, and a plugin for using Prismer Cloud.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Prismer-AI/PrismerCloud --skill design-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Prismer-AI/PrismerCloudWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/prismer-ai/prismercloud/design-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prismer-ai/prismercloud/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prismer-ai/prismercloud/design-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prismer-ai/prismercloud/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prismer-ai/prismercloud/design-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.02572 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.01029 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00514 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00257 |
Grade A, and why
design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
design-review
对一个改动方案 / diff做 CLAUDE.md 强制的五维变更审计，产出每一维的判定（covered / gap / N-A-带理由），由非实施 agent 执行（apc/05 §2 S6 · apc/12 design-review 行；与 S5 code-review 同精神——实施者不自审自的设计）。
什么时候用：一个 design doc / migration / ADD COLUMN / 新 endpoint / UI 重做进评审门时，需要独立核对它有没有把五维都想全。这是设计期的漏，比 phase 末期补漏便宜 10×（CLAUDE.md 五维审计）。
评审独立性（第一铁律，P2-17）
评审由非实施 agent 执行——设计者不自审自的方案，与 no-self-approval 同精神。若你就是这份设计的作者 → 停手，让另一个 agent 审。
五维（缺一维 = 未闭合；N/A 也要显式写理由）
照 CLAUDE.md「Five-Dimension Change Audit」逐维答。任一维标"未考虑"/"待后续评估"不能进实施；N/A 也要显式写原因。
| # | 维度 | 必答问题（摘 CLAUDE.md） | 证据手段 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 前端 UI/UX 渲染交互 | 用户在哪儿感知？哪些组件/hook/路径改？破坏交互肌肉记忆吗？刷新/跨设备？错误态如何 surface？ | rg 组件/路由 |
| 2 | 服务端 data-model & 数据流 | 哪些 Prisma model / SQL table 改？migration 编号？读/写/缓存路径？同事务保证？跨实例 fan-out？ | rg schema；ls src/im/sql | sort | tail 看下一个编号；双 Prisma（SQLite + MySQL）都改了吗 |
| 3 | Endpoint spec | 新增/改/弃用哪些 HTTP/WS/SSE？req/resp schema？认证级别？错误码？兼容策略？SDK 类型同步？ | rg 路由/handler |
| 4 | Daemon runtime / SDK & local-cache-first | daemon SDK 要适配吗？本地 SQLite/FS/asset-cache 变化？离线 fallback？daemon↔cloud 版本协商？多语言 SDK 同步？ | rg runtime/；想 local-first：cloud-only 的东西 daemon 学得到吗 |
| 5 | Built-in skill / agent-role | 影响 SKILL.md / AGENTS.md / SOUL.md / operatingPrinciples 吗？要新 built-in skill？role template backfill？agent 端 prompt 更新？ | rg built-in-skills/ · role template |
Procedure
1. 独立性自证（若挂 task）— 你不是设计作者
2. 逐维审，每维产一条判定
对每一维给一行判定，形状：
{ dimension: 1..5,
verdict: covered | gap | n/a,
reason: "<covered: 方案怎么覆盖的 + 残留问题 / gap: 漏了什么、会怎么坏 / n/a: 为什么这维不适用>" }
gap是承重判据：方案没提的维度，标gap并说清"这个洞会怎么坏"（如：cloud-only 的 cap，daemon 本地 LLM 路径学不到 → 离线不 enforce）。别因为方案没写就默默跳过当它 covered——静默跳过正是五维审计要抓的头号反 pattern（单维过度聚焦）。n/a必须带理由：一维确实不适用（纯计费门不碰 agent 能力 → 第 5 维 N/A），显式写理由。不许留空、不许"待评估"。covered不虚报：方案真覆盖的维度，标 covered、只列真实残留问题（错误码待补、跨设备回显待确认）。不要把正常设计说成 blocker——假阳会淹没真信号（照 S5 code-review "干净 diff 不虚报"）。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago First seen · 123 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 97ee6732ae73
design-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Prismer-AI/PrismerCloud (1,386 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 2,572 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-29.
Other skills, from other repositories
enrich
Enrich project memory by mining 100 recently merged PRs: extracts decisions, conventions, gotchas, and architectural facts from PR discussions, review comments, and PR bodies.
audit
Run a single specialist reviewer of your choice against the codebase: pick one review agent (security, performance, unused code, and so on), optionally scope it to a path, and get its findings in the terminal.
reportloop
Interactively walk through all issues in REVIEWREPORT.md: explains each issue, asks to fix or skip, handles follow-up questions, and applies fixes one by one in severity order.
reviewcrew
Run a full codebase audit: spawns all specialist reviewers in parallel and writes a consolidated report to REVIEWREPORT.md.
atom-audit-fleet
Audit every atom in parallel against the component guidelines, one worker per small group, merging rows into one ATOMAUDIT.md table (orchestrator-workers variant of atom-audit). Use when the atom count is 6 or more and COMPONENTGUIDELINES.md exists. Do not use below 6 atoms (use atom-audit single-agent), without…
frontend-design
Design, build, and critique frontend UI/UX: layouts, CSS, Tailwind, landing pages, and visual polish.