Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/procoders/superpowers-v/compound-vnpx skills add procoders/superpowers-v --skill compound-vgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/procoders/superpowers-vWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/procoders/superpowers-v/compound-v)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/procoders/superpowers-v/compound-v"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/procoders/superpowers-v/compound-v.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00103 | $0.07142 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.03571 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01428 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00714 |
Grade A, and why
compound-v scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 272 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compound V
"You don't tell people you're injecting them with Compound V. You just hand them the spec and watch them go faster." — internal Vought memo, probably
Compound V is a transparent interceptor that sits between Superpowers phases AND, as of v1.0, a lightweight execution orchestrator — the orchestrated pipeline is now the default execution path. You don't invoke it directly — it fires automatically at four transitions:
Stage −1 — Pre-Evaluation (v2.9). Before Trigger 0 even offers recon, a fast, cheap Pre-Evaluation scores the change request on two separate axes (difficulty ⊥ impact) from deterministic tiered evidence and — only when a change is provably trivial and low-impact — OFFERS a proportionate fast-path that collapses the full pipeline into one scope-gated implementer plus one combined SPEC+QUALITY Opus review. Everything else routes to the full pipeline below. It uses no raw LLM magnitude, never auto-routes (it only ever offers), and fails closed on any ambiguity, sensitive-path touch, or shared-token/a11y surface. A sibling post-diff re-classifier can still ESCALATE an accepted fast-path back to the full pipeline before merge (minting a new run-id, never mutating the frozen manifest). See phase-preeval.md; the offer/accept decision is captured as a thin ADR via /v:adr.
- Before
brainstormingbegins → offers a gated pre-brainstorm recon (Trigger 0): a bounded deep-research/WebSearch pass that writes an anti-anchoring recon doc todocs/superpowers/recon/— evidence to widen the brainstorm's questions, never a conclusion to converge on. See phase-0-recon.md. - After
brainstorming, beforewriting-plans→ injects THREE parallel pre-flights:- Phase 1A: Code-Archaeology — the technical reality of the existing code
- Phase 1B: Domain-Expert Advisor — the product/domain reality (web-searched if needed, knowledge-base persisted)
- Phase 1C: Library/Doc Validator — library currency via Context7 MCP (stale deps, abandoned libs, outdated API signatures)
- Inside
writing-plans→ enforces Disjoint File Partitioning and materializes amanifest.yaml(the machine-readable contract) so tasks can run in parallel - At execution → runs the orchestration pipeline: dispatch each manifested job to its backend (Claude subagent on Opus by default, Sonnet only for clearly junior mechanical tasks, or a headless Codex worker for large isolated builds — see
phase-3-parallel-opus-dispatch.md), enforce file-scope with agit diffgate after every job, collect canonicaljob_results, review against the spec's Acceptance Criteria, and update outcome memory. Runs autonomously with guardrails and is crash-resumable viastate.json.
The unified pipeline (orchestrator-as-default):
★ PRE-EVAL (v2.9) two-axis score → OFFER fast-path | FULL_PIPELINE (fail-closed; never auto-routes)
│ └─ accepted fast-path ─► materialize 1-job manifest ─► implement ─► scope gate
│ ─► post-diff re-classify (ESCALATE → full pipeline, new run-id) ─► review ─► merge
▼ (full pipeline)
★ RECON (gated) docs/superpowers/recon/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md (Trigger 0 — skip: plumbing | KB hit | off)
▼
brainstorm ─► spec (carries feature-level Acceptance Criteria)
▼ auto-fire
[1A archaeology ∥ 1B domain ∥ 1C library] ─► 3 audits (🔴 critical finding → HALT)
▼ writing-plans + Phase 2 Partition Map
★ MANIFEST docs/superpowers/execution/<run-id>/manifest.yaml (partition FAIL → HALT)
▼ DISPATCH — batched Task (4–6) ∥ Codex via backend-launcher; per-job worktree|direct
★ COLLECT + SCOPE GATE git diff --name-only vs write_allowed (violation → BLOCKED → HALT)
▼ REVIEW spec + quality + final integration (Opus), AC-gated (unfixable ISSUES → HALT)
▼ MEMORY append task-outcomes.jsonl + routing-lessons.md
▼ finishing-a-development-branch
state.json updated after every phase ──► /v:status · /v:resume
What ships with it
23 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- adr-capture.md 7.1 KB
- brainstorm-elicitation.md 18 KB
- cross-model-review.md 4.7 KB
- decision-preferences.md 14 KB
- doc-validator-prompt.md 8.8 KB
- domain-expert-prompt.md 8.0 KB
- epic-mode.md 49 KB
- execution-manifest.md 28 KB
- failure-policy.md 15 KB
- memory.md 9.6 KB
- onboarding.md 22 KB
- phase-0-recon.md 20 KB
- phase-1a-archaeology.md 4.5 KB
- phase-1b-domain-expert.md 10 KB
- phase-1c-documentation-validation.md 9.4 KB
- phase-2-disjoint-partitioning.md 12 KB
- phase-3-parallel-opus-dispatch.md 33 KB
- phase-preeval.md 12 KB
- rationalization-table.md 16 KB
- routing-policy.md 30 KB
- skill-escalation.md 4.4 KB
- state-machine.md 20 KB
- workflows-accelerator.md 3.9 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 272 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A b10d813f3ca3
compound-v is a skill published in the GitHub repository procoders/superpowers-v (35 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 7,142 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
Adversarial senior review of the spec before any code is written. Constructs a skeptical reviewer whose authority comes from the codebase, §R research, and live best-practice — then tries to REFUTE the spec, not rubber-stamp it. Every finding cites evidence (file:line or source); unverifiable ones are flagged.…
caveman
Caveman encoding for SPEC.md and spec-adjacent writes. Loaded by /spec, /build, /check. Cuts tokens 75% vs prose while staying precise. Triggers on any write to SPEC.md or when user says "caveman", "compress this", "be brief".
check
Read-only drift detector. Diffs SPEC.md against current code and reports violations grouped by severity. Writes nothing — suggests remedies via the spec or build skills but never invokes them. Triggers when the user asks to check drift, audit the spec, verify invariants, or ask whether code still matches the spec.…
deepen
Optional design-improvement pass for when you have spare usage to drain. Finds the shallowest modules in the code the spec touches, researches a deeper design, and proposes refactors that shrink interfaces and hide decisions — behavior held constant, tests green before and after. Proposes §I/§V/§T edits, never silent…
agentshield
This skill teaches the core development patterns and conventions used in the agentshield TypeScript codebase. It covers file naming, import/export styles, commit message conventions, and testing patterns. This guide is designed to help contributors quickly align with the project's established practices and workflows.
grill
Calibrated interrogation of a fuzzy idea before it becomes a spec. Asks one question at a time, recommends an answer, and lands each answer in §G (goal) or §C (constraints) — unknowns parked as ? items, never guessed. The cheapest place to kill a bad idea is before §T exists. Triggers when the user has a vague idea…