Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit --skill askit-build-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit/askit-build-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit/askit-build-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit/askit-build-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit/askit-build-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit/askit-build-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.00537 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00269 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
askit-build-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
askit-build-workflow
Purpose
Author a plugin's workflows: ordered arcs that chain multiple skills toward an outcome (Standard sec 3.4). Two modes: create authors _workflows/<name>.md (steps, inputs/outputs handed between steps, exit criteria); improve resolves findings. Authoring depth is in references/authoring-workflows.md. Follows the shared builder contract (../../docs/reference/builder-pattern.md).
When to use
When the user asks to author, scaffold, or improve a workflow, or to formalize a recurring multi-skill sequence into an ordered arc.
create mode
- Identify the recurring arc: the ordered skills, what is handed between steps, and the exit criteria. Skip the interview if in context.
- Author
_workflows/<name>.md(copytemplates/workflow.md): frontmattersteps(each naming the skill it invokes) plus a body describing the handoffs and exit criteria. - Every referenced skill MUST exist (S5). Every chaining step MUST be permitted by the chain contract (sec 3.4); use
askit-build-chain-contractto add the permission if needed. - A workflow SHOULD declare which agent targets it supports.
- Evaluate (
node scripts/evaluate.mjs . --json) until S5 is clean.
improve mode
- Run evaluate and read findings.
- For an S5 finding (a step references a skill not on disk), fix the skill name or create the skill. Tighten the handoffs and exit criteria.
- Re-run to confirm.
Scope
A workflow is _workflows/<name>.md with ordered steps and exit criteria (sec 3.4). Referenced skills must exist (S5) and chaining steps must be chain-permitted (sec 3.6). The deterministic workflow-step chain-permission check (step orphans) is a planned enhancement; today S5 enforces step skill-existence and the chain contract governs component-to-component invocation.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 32 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 205b1bfba062
askit-build-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 537 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
modelchk
Size a task's run before spending it: the cheapest sufficient capability tier (fast, standard, frontier) and the reasoning effort within it, on a neutral scale that binds to whatever levels the model exposes. Use when work seems over- or under-powered, costly, ambiguous, or high-risk, or asks which model class and how…
autobahn
Carve guardrail-adjacent items out of scope with safe alternatives before risk-adjacent work starts, then run the safe remainder at full strength in a fresh subagent that only ever sees the carved prompt, never the risky input. Use when a task includes stealth, scraping, privacy, IP, policy, licensing, security, or…
re0-release
Walk a pending change through this repo's shipping and releasing checklist end to end, then tag and publish once confirmed. User-invoked: run it when you've decided to ship.
ssotize
Audit and consolidate a fact that's scattered across places into one canonical source, after approval, and replace the rest with references. Use when asked to find duplication, check consistency, locate the source of truth, deduplicate, consolidate, unify, or establish SSOT across artifacts or platforms. Starts…
feynman
Press a decision you just made until you can explain it to a skeptic in your own words, or surface the gap where you can't. The Feynman test aimed at a choice: understanding is cheapest to fake the moment after you decide, so a fresh critic presses for what you can't actually explain. Use right after picking an…
macrothink
User-invoked read-only pass for checking whether the current direction is tunnel-visioned: strip the session's bait, fan out 2 to 5 same-model fresh reads, and report divergence first without treating convergence as proof.