Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit --skill askit-decisiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit/askit-decision)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit/askit-decision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit/askit-decision/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit/askit-decision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit/askit-decision.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00656 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00328 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
askit-decision scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 34 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
askit-decision
Purpose
Author and maintain a plugin's governed decisions: numbered MADR ADRs under docs/internal/decisions/ and RFCs under docs/internal/rfcs/. Three modes: adr records an architecture decision; rfc drafts a cross-cutting proposal (for example, to evolve the Standard); summary emits and lints the mandatory 3-line TL;DR (Decision / Why / Status) on a long ADR or RFC (the summary-plus-detailed convention, ADR 0021). Authoring depth is in references/authoring-decisions.md.
When to use
When the user makes or records an architecture decision, proposes a change to the Standard or the plugin via an RFC, or needs the TL;DR companion for a decision doc.
adr mode
- Pick the next ADR number (
docs/internal/decisions/NNNN-title.md). - Author MADR: Status, Date, Deciders, Context, Decision drivers, Considered options, Decision outcome, Consequences. Copy
templates/adr.md. - Add the mandatory
## TL;DR(Decision / Why / Status) immediately under the title (ADR 0021 convention). - Fill the
## Implementation sitessection: rungrep -rn "<key behavioral terms>" scripts/to find every file and function that carries the decision. List each as a bullet: file path, function name, one sentence on what property of the decision it enforces. A vague entry ("the report renderer") is obviously wrong; a useful entry names the file and function so a future reader can verify without searching. ADRs that are governance-only with no code implementation say so explicitly. - ADRs are immutable once accepted; supersede rather than rewrite.
rfc mode
- Author an RFC under
docs/internal/rfcs/for a cross-cutting proposal (a Standard amendment, a new convention). - Include the problem, the proposal, the alternatives, and the migration/impact. On acceptance, graduate the outcome to an ADR.
summary mode
- Read a long ADR or RFC and emit (or lint) the 3-line
## TL;DR(Decision / Why / Status), so the summary and the detailed body never diverge.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 34 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 4fc91f83e357
askit-decision is a skill published in the GitHub repository product-on-purpose/agent-skills-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 656 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
modelchk
Size a task's run before spending it: the cheapest sufficient capability tier (fast, standard, frontier) and the reasoning effort within it, on a neutral scale that binds to whatever levels the model exposes. Use when work seems over- or under-powered, costly, ambiguous, or high-risk, or asks which model class and how…
autobahn
Carve guardrail-adjacent items out of scope with safe alternatives before risk-adjacent work starts, then run the safe remainder at full strength in a fresh subagent that only ever sees the carved prompt, never the risky input. Use when a task includes stealth, scraping, privacy, IP, policy, licensing, security, or…
re0-release
Walk a pending change through this repo's shipping and releasing checklist end to end, then tag and publish once confirmed. User-invoked: run it when you've decided to ship.
ssotize
Audit and consolidate a fact that's scattered across places into one canonical source, after approval, and replace the rest with references. Use when asked to find duplication, check consistency, locate the source of truth, deduplicate, consolidate, unify, or establish SSOT across artifacts or platforms. Starts…
re0-plan
Open a paperthin iteration's casebook before re0-loop's first turn — seeded with real content the moment the folder exists, never an empty directory. User-invoked, paperthin-only: assumes the full skill package installed. Run when opening a new build cycle in this repo.
feynman
Press a decision you just made until you can explain it to a skeptic in your own words, or surface the gap where you can't. The Feynman test aimed at a choice: understanding is cheapest to fake the moment after you decide, so a fresh critic presses for what you can't actually explain. Use right after picking an…