Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill foundation-stakeholder-updategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/foundation-stakeholder-update)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/foundation-stakeholder-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/foundation-stakeholder-update/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/foundation-stakeholder-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/foundation-stakeholder-update.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00096 | $0.01596 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00798 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00319 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00160 |
Grade A, and why
foundation-stakeholder-update scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Stakeholder Update
A stakeholder update is async communication to readers who need to know the outcomes of a meeting. Primary audience is non-attendees; secondary audience is some attendees who want a reference version (came in late, stepped out, need something to forward).
Distinct from foundation-meeting-recap in audience, format, and purpose: the recap is a summary of what happened for people who were in the room; the stakeholder-update is a translation of outcomes into what-it-means for readers (tailored to their role, with technical-to-business translation where the audience warrants it).
Distinct from /discover-stakeholder-summary: that skill is about understanding stakeholders (input to the user's work). This skill is about communicating to stakeholders (output from the user's work).
This skill belongs to the Meeting Skills Family. It conforms to the Meeting Skills Family Contract.
When to Use
- After a meeting with outcomes affecting teams who were not in the room
- When a decision or commitment needs to propagate to downstream teams async
- When a recap exists and needs to be translated into audience-specific language
- When the user needs something from readers (specific CTA) and cannot afford for it to be buried
When NOT to Use
- Summarizing what happened for attendees. Use
foundation-meeting-recap. - Broadcasting status with no specific audience tailoring. A plain Slack message is sufficient; the skill adds value when translation or CTA framing matters.
- Communicating research findings to stakeholders. Use
/discover-interview-synthesisplus targeted comms. - The source is not one meeting's outcomes but a broader artifact (a spec, discovery synthesis, research report, GTM plan, or experiment results) that needs to fan out to several audience-tailored briefings from one canonical master. Use
foundation-stakeholder-briefings.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 107 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A ce252de6de7d
foundation-stakeholder-update is a skill published in the GitHub repository product-on-purpose/pm-skills (663 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 1,596 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
status-update-writer
Use when the user asks to write a status update, weekly or monthly update, stakeholder update, project update, standup, status report, or QBR. Do NOT use for writing a PRD or a retro doc — those need different structures.
stakeholder-update
Translate the same underlying project status into audience-appropriate versions (exec-brief, engineering-detail, customer-facing) without changing the underlying facts. Use when a PM needs to write a status update, especially when the same update needs to go to multiple different audiences. Pairs with…
scope-cut
Decision framework for what to cut when a spec, sprint, or launch is too big for the time or team available. Use whenever a PM says a scope needs to shrink, a deadline is fixed and the work isn't, or someone asks "what can we cut" or "what's the MVP version of this." Also trigger when reviewing a spec that feels…
escalation-judgment
Decision framework for whether a blocker, risk, or conflict is actually worth escalating to leadership versus resolving at the working level. Use when a PM is unsure whether to "loop in" a director/VP, when a team is stuck and someone suggests escalating, or when reviewing whether a past escalation was warranted. Also…
okrs
Use when asked to "set OKRs", "objectives and key results", "quarterly OKR planning", "align objectives", "measure OKR progress", or "focus priorities with OKRs". Helps teams focus on what matters most and create a cadence of progress. The OKR framework (originated by Andy Grove at Intel, popularized by John Doerr at…
shape-up
Use when asked to "shape up", "run a shaping session", "set an appetite", "scope a project without estimates", "betting table", or "ship in fixed cycles". Helps teams escape estimate-driven development and Scrum fatigue. The Shape Up method (created by Ryan Singer at Basecamp/37signals) uses fixed time boxes, variable…