code-review

A skill for reviewing code changes and pull requests, which are proposed sets of changes shared for review before they are merged. It analyzes differences and reports specific improvement suggestions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect a diff, review a pull request, identify issues, and suggest concrete improvements.
Why use it?
Important bugs, maintainability problems, or unclear changes can be missed during a quick review. This helps turn a code comparison into actionable feedback.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/profclaw/profclaw/code-review
Any agent
npx skills add profclaw/profclaw --skill code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/profclaw/profclaw

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 17 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 929 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00017 $0.00929
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.00464
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00186
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00093

Measured 2d ago against content hash dc413c096b2b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/code-review/SKILL.md · 117 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed AGPL-3.0

The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 117 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A dc413c096b2b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository profclaw/profclaw (16 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 929 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

author

Scaffold a conforming AI-layer artifact — a rule, skill, hook, agent, or output style — that already passes the format checks, then verify it. Use when adding any new .claude/ artifact, so it matches the existing shape instead of drifting.

Ashkaan/contextium · 56 tokens

close

The "wrap" verb of the loop — end the session by writing the journal entry, updating touched project READMEs, committing, and pushing. Auto-invoked as the tail of /spec and /implement (the producer verbs) on clean completion, so "wrap" is not a verb the user types; also runnable directly. Dispatches /implement-audit…

Ashkaan/contextium · 121 tokens

debate

Adversarial debate — spawn competing AI agents to argue a question, then synthesize the strongest conclusion. Use when the user says "debate this", "I'm torn between X and Y", "red-team this plan", or "council on this".

Ashkaan/contextium · 56 tokens

implement-audit

Adversarial review of freshly-built code — find what was missed, what's inconsistent, what breaks. The single code reviewer for the loop, and it runs exactly once per session. Auto-fired by /implement; standalone-callable after any substantial ad-hoc change. Emits the implement-audit: commit trailer the git hook…

Ashkaan/contextium · 71 tokens

extreme-router-refactor

Code refactoring, tech debt cleanup, and code review expertise for ExtremeRouter. Use when cleaning up code, fixing bugs, reviewing PRs, identifying tech debt, or when the user asks to "improve this code", "fix this mess", "why is this broken", "make this cleaner", or mentions code smells, duplication, or poor…

rsalmn/ExtremeRouter · 78 tokens

extremerouter-web-search

Web search via ExtremeRouter /v1/search using Tavily / Exa / Brave / Serper / SearXNG / Google PSE / Linkup / SearchAPI / You.com / Perplexity. Use when the user wants to search the web, look up information, find articles, or query a search engine.

rsalmn/ExtremeRouter · 73 tokens