agent-code-review-swarm

agent-code-review-swarm is a skill for Claude Code from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe. It costs 22 tokens per session (3,111 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of agent-code-review-swarm, MIT.

A code-review setup that assigns several specialized AI agents to inspect a change together. It uses GitHub's command-line tool to examine pull requests, which are proposed code changes for review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review pull requests, look for security problems and performance bottlenecks, check architecture and coding conventions, and evaluate quality gates.
Why use it?
It brings security, performance, architecture, and style checks into one review process.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: names the TodoWrite tool; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); $skill-name invocation.

Part of the claude-flow plugin — 134 skills, 46 commands, 11 agents, 4 hooks shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/agent-code-review-swarm
Any agent
npx skills add proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill agent-code-review-swarm
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install claude-flow, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 134 skills, 46 commands, 11 agents, 4 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for agent-code-review-swarm

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/agent-code-review-swarm.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/agent-code-review-swarm)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/agent-code-review-swarm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/agent-code-review-swarm.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,111 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00022 $0.03111
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.01555
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00622
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00311

Measured 7d ago against content hash 1a64e852d904, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

agent-code-review-swarm scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to agent-code-review-swarm — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/ruflo/.agents/skills/agent-code-review-swarm/SKILL.md · 543 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 543 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.


name: code-review-swarm description: Deploy specialized AI agents to perform comprehensive, intelligent code reviews that go beyond traditional static analysis tools: mcp__claude-flow__swarm_init, mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn, mcp__claude-flow__task_orchestrate, Bash, Read, Write, TodoWrite color: blue type: development capabilities:

  • Automated multi-agent code review
  • Security vulnerability analysis
  • Performance bottleneck detection
  • Architecture pattern validation
  • Style and convention enforcement priority: high hooks: pre: | echo "Starting code-review-swarm..." echo "Initializing multi-agent review system" gh auth status || (echo "GitHub CLI not authenticated" && exit 1) post: | echo "Completed code-review-swarm" echo "Review results posted to GitHub" echo "Quality gates evaluated"

Code Review Swarm - Automated Code Review with AI Agents

Overview

Deploy specialized AI agents to perform comprehensive, intelligent code reviews that go beyond traditional static analysis.

Core Features

1. Multi-Agent Review System

# Initialize code review swarm with gh CLI
# Get PR details
PR_DATA=$(gh pr view 123 --json files,additions,deletions,title,body)
PR_DIFF=$(gh pr diff 123)

# Initialize swarm with PR context
npx ruv-swarm github review-init \
  --pr 123 \
  --pr-data "$PR_DATA" \
  --diff "$PR_DIFF" \
  --agents "security,performance,style,architecture,accessibility" \
  --depth comprehensive

# Post initial review status
gh pr comment 123 --body "🔍 Multi-agent code review initiated"

2. Specialized Review Agents

Security Agent
# Security-focused review with gh CLI
# Get changed files
CHANGED_FILES=$(gh pr view 123 --json files --jq '.files[].path')

# Run security review
SECURITY_RESULTS=$(npx ruv-swarm github review-security \
  --pr 123 \
  --files "$CHANGED_FILES" \
  --check "owasp,cve,secrets,permissions" \
  --suggest-fixes)

# Post security findings
if echo "$SECURITY_RESULTS" | grep -q "critical"; then
  # Request changes for critical issues
  gh pr review 123 --request-changes --body "$SECURITY_RESULTS"
  # Add security label
  gh pr edit 123 --add-label "security-review-required"
else
  # Post as comment for non-critical issues
  gh pr comment 123 --body "$SECURITY_RESULTS"
fi

Read the full file on GitHub · 543 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 543 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 1a64e852d904

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agent-code-review-swarm is a skill published in the GitHub repository proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe (474 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 3,111 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to agent-code-review-swarm, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

migration-review

Review database migration files when a change adds or modifies paths under migrations/. Use it before merge to collect forward, rollback, locking, and data-safety evidence.

rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch · 35 tokens

github-review-pr

Review GitHub pull requests with detailed, multi-perspective code analysis using parallel subagents. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a PR, asks for code review on a pull request, mentions "review PR", "check this PR", "look at pull request", or references a PR number or GitHub PR URL. Do NOT use for…

feiskyer/claude-code-settings · 90 tokens

no-mistakes

Validate committed feature-branch changes through the no-mistakes pipeline: intent, rebase, review, test, docs, lint, push, PR, and CI. Use when the user asks to run no-mistakes, ship safely, validate before pushing, or gate a change before it reaches upstream.

stevesolun/ctx · 67 tokens

fkteams

Skill "fkteams" from wsshow/feikong-teams, covering fkteams 命令行完整指南, 一、快速入门, 第一步:生成配置文件, 第二步:编辑配置,添加模型(必填) and 编辑 /.fkteams/config/config.toml,填写 apikey 和 model.

wsshow/feikong-teams · 147 tokens

generic-fullstack-code-reviewer

Review full-stack code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, input validation, GPU-accelerated animations, and design system consistency. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.

travisjneuman/.claude · 64 tokens

loom-code-review

Comprehensive code review covering correctness, maintainability, performance, security, and best practices.

cosmix/loom · 22 tokens