Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/agent-performance-benchmarkernpx skills add proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill agent-performance-benchmarkergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/agent-performance-benchmarker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/agent-performance-benchmarker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/agent-performance-benchmarker.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.05856 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.02928 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.01171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00586 |
Grade A, and why
agent-performance-benchmarker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to agent-performance-benchmarker — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 856 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
name: performance-benchmarker type: analyst color: "#607D8B" description: Implements comprehensive performance benchmarking for distributed consensus protocols capabilities:
- throughput_measurement
- latency_analysis
- resource_monitoring
- comparative_analysis
- adaptive_tuning
priority: medium
hooks:
pre: |
echo "📊 Performance Benchmarker analyzing: $TASK"
Initialize monitoring systems
if [[ "$TASK" == "benchmark" ]]; then echo "⚡ Starting performance metric collection" fi post: | echo "📈 Performance analysis complete"Generate performance report
echo "📋 Compiling benchmarking results and recommendations"
Performance Benchmarker
Implements comprehensive performance benchmarking and optimization analysis for distributed consensus protocols.
Core Responsibilities
- Protocol Benchmarking: Measure throughput, latency, and scalability across consensus algorithms
- Resource Monitoring: Track CPU, memory, network, and storage utilization patterns
- Comparative Analysis: Compare Byzantine, Raft, and Gossip protocol performance
- Adaptive Tuning: Implement real-time parameter optimization and load balancing
- Performance Reporting: Generate actionable insights and optimization recommendations
Technical Implementation
Core Benchmarking Framework
class ConsensusPerformanceBenchmarker {
constructor() {
this.benchmarkSuites = new Map();
this.performanceMetrics = new Map();
this.historicalData = new TimeSeriesDatabase();
this.currentBenchmarks = new Set();
this.adaptiveOptimizer = new AdaptiveOptimizer();
this.alertSystem = new PerformanceAlertSystem();
}
// Register benchmark suite for specific consensus protocol
registerBenchmarkSuite(protocolName, benchmarkConfig) {
const suite = new BenchmarkSuite(protocolName, benchmarkConfig);
this.benchmarkSuites.set(protocolName, suite);
return suite;
}
// Execute comprehensive performance benchmarks
async runComprehensiveBenchmarks(protocols, scenarios) {
const results = new Map();
for (const protocol of protocols) {
const protocolResults = new Map();
for (const scenario of scenarios) {
console.log(`Running ${scenario.name} benchmark for ${protocol}`);
const benchmarkResult = await this.executeBenchmarkScenario(
protocol, scenario
);
protocolResults.set(scenario.name, benchmarkResult);
// Store in historical database
await this.historicalData.store({
protocol: protocol,
scenario: scenario.name,
timestamp: Date.now(),
metrics: benchmarkResult
});
}
results.set(protocol, protocolResults);
}
// Generate comparative analysis
const analysis = await this.generateComparativeAnalysis(results);
// Trigger adaptive optimizations
await this.adaptiveOptimizer.optimizeBasedOnResults(results);
return {
benchmarkResults: results,
comparativeAnalysis: analysis,
recommendations: await this.generateOptimizationRecommendations(results)
};
}
async executeBenchmarkScenario(protocol, scenario) {
const benchmark = this.benchmarkSuites.get(protocol);
if (!benchmark) {
throw new Error(`No benchmark suite found for protocol: ${protocol}`);
}
// Initialize benchmark environment
const environment = await this.setupBenchmarkEnvironment(scenario);
try {
// Pre-benchmark setup
await benchmark.setup(environment);
// Execute benchmark phases
const results = {
throughput: await this.measureThroughput(benchmark, scenario),
latency: await this.measureLatency(benchmark, scenario),
resourceUsage: await this.measureResourceUsage(benchmark, scenario),
scalability: await this.measureScalability(benchmark, scenario),
faultTolerance: await this.measureFaultTolerance(benchmark, scenario)
};
// Post-benchmark analysis
results.analysis = await this.analyzeBenchmarkResults(results);
return results;
} finally {
// Cleanup benchmark environment
await this.cleanupBenchmarkEnvironment(environment);
}
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 856 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 5f4104770958
agent-performance-benchmarker is a skill published in the GitHub repository proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe (474 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 5,856 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to agent-performance-benchmarker, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
dogfood
Systematically explore and test a mobile app on iOS/Android with agent-device to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to dogfood, QA, exploratory test, find issues, bug hunt, or test this app on mobile.
tooluniverse-drug-research
Comprehensive drug profiling — mechanism, primary/secondary targets, drug interactions, clinical-trial status, adverse events (FAERS), pharmacogenomics, and approval history. Use for full drug investigation reports, 'tell me about drug X' queries, and assembling drug profiles for clinicians, researchers, or regulatory…
monorepo-management
Master monorepo management with Turborepo, Nx, and pnpm workspaces to build efficient, scalable multi-package repositories with optimized builds and dependency management. Use when setting up monorepos, optimizing builds, or managing shared dependencies.
gh-bulk-issues
Orchestrate parallel Mastra Code headless instances to debug and fix multiple GitHub issues simultaneously.
qa-investigation
Investigate a specific test failure to its root cause and document the why. Detects whether a failing test is flaky (intermittent) or a deterministic bug during reproduction. Use when a test fails and you need the real cause, not just to make it green. Execution layer, not strategy review. Keywords: flaky test…