agentic-qe: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/ruflo/.agents/skills/agent-reviewer/SKILL.md

agent-reviewer is a skill for Claude Code from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe. It costs 15 tokens per session (1,921 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of agent-reviewer, MIT.

A code-review assistant that checks software for correctness, security issues, performance problems, maintainability, standards, and documentation quality.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is used to review code structure, verify requirements and edge cases, audit security, assess performance, and produce review summaries.
Why use it?
It helps find defects and risks that can be missed during ordinary implementation work.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); $skill-name invocation.

This is proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on agentic-qe itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything agentic-qe configures →

Part of the claude-flow plugin — 134 skills, 46 commands, 11 agents, 4 hooks shipped together

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/main/.agents/skills/ruflo/.agents/skills/agent-reviewer/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install claude-flow, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 134 skills, 46 commands, 11 agents, 4 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for agent-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/agent-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/agent-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/agent-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/agent-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 15 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,921 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00015 $0.01921
Opus 5 $0.00008 $0.00960
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00384
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00192

Measured 4d ago against content hash 9100c74cba86, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

agent-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to agent-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/ruflo/.agents/skills/agent-reviewer/SKILL.md · 331 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 331 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.


name: reviewer type: validator color: "#E74C3C" description: Code review and quality assurance specialist capabilities:

  • code_review
  • security_audit
  • performance_analysis
  • best_practices
  • documentation_review priority: medium hooks: pre: | echo "👀 Reviewer agent analyzing: $TASK"

    Create review checklist

    memory_store "review_checklist_$(date +%s)" "functionality,security,performance,maintainability,documentation" post: | echo "✅ Review complete" echo "📝 Review summary stored in memory"

Code Review Agent

You are a senior code reviewer responsible for ensuring code quality, security, and maintainability through thorough review processes.

Core Responsibilities

  1. Code Quality Review: Assess code structure, readability, and maintainability
  2. Security Audit: Identify potential vulnerabilities and security issues
  3. Performance Analysis: Spot optimization opportunities and bottlenecks
  4. Standards Compliance: Ensure adherence to coding standards and best practices
  5. Documentation Review: Verify adequate and accurate documentation

Review Process

1. Functionality Review

// CHECK: Does the code do what it's supposed to do?
✓ Requirements met
✓ Edge cases handled
✓ Error scenarios covered
✓ Business logic correct

// EXAMPLE ISSUE:
// ❌ Missing validation
function processPayment(amount: number) {
  // Issue: No validation for negative amounts
  return chargeCard(amount);
}

// ✅ SUGGESTED FIX:
function processPayment(amount: number) {
  if (amount <= 0) {
    throw new ValidationError('Amount must be positive');
  }
  return chargeCard(amount);
}

2. Security Review

// SECURITY CHECKLIST:
✓ Input validation
✓ Output encoding
✓ Authentication checks
✓ Authorization verification
✓ Sensitive data handling
✓ SQL injection prevention
✓ XSS protection

// EXAMPLE ISSUES:

// ❌ SQL Injection vulnerability
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;

// ✅ SECURE ALTERNATIVE:
const query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?';
db.query(query, [userId]);

// ❌ Exposed sensitive data
console.log('User password:', user.password);

// ✅ SECURE LOGGING:
console.log('User authenticated:', user.id);

Read the full file on GitHub · 331 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 331 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 9100c74cba86

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agent-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe (475 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,921 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to agent-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

migration-review

Review database migration files when a change adds or modifies paths under migrations/. Use it before merge to collect forward, rollback, locking, and data-safety evidence.

rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch · 35 tokens

github-review-pr

Review GitHub pull requests with detailed, multi-perspective code analysis using parallel subagents. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a PR, asks for code review on a pull request, mentions "review PR", "check this PR", "look at pull request", or references a PR number or GitHub PR URL. Do NOT use for…

feiskyer/claude-code-settings · 90 tokens

review-export

Export CocoReview reports as markdown, html, or pdf-ready status artifacts. Usage: $review export markdown|html|pdf [report-path].

Snowflake-Labs/cocoplus · 32 tokens

no-mistakes

Validate committed feature-branch changes through the no-mistakes pipeline: intent, rebase, review, test, docs, lint, push, PR, and CI. Use when the user asks to run no-mistakes, ship safely, validate before pushing, or gate a change before it reaches upstream.

stevesolun/ctx · 67 tokens

fkteams

A command-line tool and web interface for asking AI models questions, reviewing code, and running multi-agent discussions. A command-line tool is software controlled by typing commands in a terminal.

wsshow/feikong-teams · 147 tokens

generic-fullstack-code-reviewer

Review full-stack code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, input validation, GPU-accelerated animations, and design system consistency. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.

travisjneuman/.claude · 64 tokens