aqe-review-quality

aqe-review-quality is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe. It costs 64 tokens per session (282 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A quality-review skill for changes made through Agentic QE, an approach to testing and checking software with coding agents. It issues a verdict based on correctness, risks, and verification evidence.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review diffs, assess regression, security, performance, compatibility, and test coverage, and report any blockers without editing code.
Why use it?
It helps determine whether a change is safe and sufficiently tested before release.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: shipped in a Claude Code plugin, but also agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); mentions AGENTS.md.

Part of the agentic-qe plugin — 41 skills, 143 commands, 10 agents, 10 hooks, 1 plugin shipped together

Good fit Use it to review diffs, assess regression, security, performance, compatibility, and test coverage, and report any blockers without editing code.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/aqe-review-quality
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill aqe-review-quality
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install agentic-qe, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 41 skills, 143 commands, 10 agents, 10 hooks, 1 plugin.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for aqe-review-quality

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/aqe-review-quality/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/aqe-review-quality)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/aqe-review-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/aqe-review-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for aqe-review-quality

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/aqe-review-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/aqe-review-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 64 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 282 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00064 $0.00282
Opus 5.5 $0.00026 $0.00113
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00056
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00028

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 8a6766357093, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

aqe-review-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/aqe-review-quality/SKILL.md · 25 lines

What it actually says

Review AQE Quality

  1. Read AGENTS.md, the diff or requested scope, affected implementation, tests, and configuration.
  2. Review for correctness first: broken behavior, data loss, security, concurrency, compatibility, and missing error paths.
  3. Use references/quality-gates.md to select relevant QE review lenses. Do not run unrelated broad scans.
  4. Verify claims with focused commands where safe and available. Distinguish observed failures from inferred risks.
  5. Report findings by severity with file and line references, the triggering scenario, and the smallest useful remediation.
  6. End with one verdict:
    • PASS: no material finding and adequate evidence;
    • CONDITIONAL: bounded risks or missing environment-dependent evidence;
    • FAIL: correctness, safety, compatibility, or verification blocker.
  7. List the exact checks run and any checks not run.

Do not edit code during a review unless the user also asks for fixes.

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 25 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 8a6766357093

Subscribe to this mod's changes

aqe-review-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe (515 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 282 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Optimize the meaningful UI available immediately from a Next.js route on an initial load (hard navigation) or named client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route and entry point at a time; the shipped test then guards…

vercel/next.js · 123 tokens