froggo-mission-control: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/ui-ux-polish/SKILL.md

ui-ux-polish is a skill for Claude Code from ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control. It costs 32 tokens per session (1,590 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

Iterative UI/UX polishing workflow for web applications. The exact prompt and methodology for achieving Stripe-level visual polish through multiple passes.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions Claude Code; mentions Codex; mentions Gemini CLI.

This is ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on froggo-mission-control itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything froggo-mission-control configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control/dev/.claude/skills/ui-ux-polish/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ui-ux-polish

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/ui-ux-polish/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/ui-ux-polish)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/ui-ux-polish"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/ui-ux-polish/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ui-ux-polish

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/ui-ux-polish"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/ui-ux-polish.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,590 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00032 $0.01590
Opus 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00636
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00318
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00159

Measured today against content hash 06faa2f5a9ac, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ui-ux-polish scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/ui-ux-polish/SKILL.md · 227 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 227 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

UI/UX Polish — Iterative Enhancement Workflow

When to Use: This is for when your site/app already works and looks decent and you want to improve it. There's a different approach when it looks bad and needs a complete overhaul.

Key Insight: Something about asking for agreement from the model ("don't you agree?") somehow motivates it to polish things up better. Also, instructing it to separately think through desktop vs mobile leads to much better outcomes.


The Workflow

Overview

  1. App already works and looks decent
  2. Run the polish prompt
  3. Agent makes incremental improvements
  4. Repeat many times (10+ iterations)
  5. Each pass adds small improvements that compound

Why Multiple Passes Work

  • Each time, it tries to make some incremental improvement, even if it's minor
  • These really add up after 10 iterations!
  • Multiple agents can work on this simultaneously
  • Cumulative effect is dramatic

THE EXACT PROMPT — UI/UX Polish

This prompt is used so frequently it's worth putting on a Stream Deck button:

I still think there are strong opportunities to enhance the UI/UX look and feel and to make everything work better and be more intuitive, user-friendly, visually appealing, polished, slick, and world class in terms of following UI/UX best practices like those used by Stripe, don't you agree? And I want you to carefully consider desktop UI/UX and mobile UI/UX separately while doing this and hyper-optimize for both separately to play to the specifics of each modality. I'm looking for true world-class visual appeal, polish, slickness, etc. that makes people gasp at how stunning and perfect it is in every way.  Use ultrathink.

Why This Prompt Works

1. Asks for Agreement

The phrase "don't you agree?" engages the model's reasoning about whether improvements are possible, rather than just executing instructions.

2. Separates Desktop and Mobile

"carefully consider desktop UI/UX and mobile UI/UX separately...
hyper-optimize for both separately to play to the specifics of each modality"

Read the full file on GitHub · 227 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 227 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 06faa2f5a9ac

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ui-ux-polish is a skill published in the GitHub repository ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,590 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-07.

Related

ui-ux-polish compared with skills from other repositories

ui-ux-polish next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
ui-ux-polishProfFroggo/froggo-mission-controlSkill26mo agoApache-2.0A32Claude Code
planjeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplaceSkill2.9kyesterdayMITA144Claude Code
dstack-prototypingdstackai/dstackSkill2.3kyesterdayMPL-2.0A80Claude Code, Codex
senior-data-engineerbenchflow-ai/skillsbenchSkill1.9k2d agoApache-2.0A100Claude Code, Codex
llm-icon-finderdaymade/claude-code-skillsSkill1.5kyesterdayMITA61Claude Code, Codex
enhance-promptgoogle-labs-code/stitch-skillsSkill8.7k2mo agoApache-2.0A41Claude Code
bim-classification-aidatadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionSkill39418d agoMITA35Claude Code, Codex