Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add proflead/codex-skills-library --skill iac-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/proflead/codex-skills-libraryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/proflead/codex-skills-library/iac-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proflead/codex-skills-library/iac-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proflead/codex-skills-library/iac-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proflead/codex-skills-library/iac-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proflead/codex-skills-library/iac-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00146 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00073 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
iac-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 27 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A cbfc71a5c776
iac-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository proflead/codex-skills-library (143 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 146 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
encoding-fix-script-first
Enforce script-only text encoding fixes in any repository. Use when files contain mojibake, broken Cyrillic/UTF-8 text, or UTF-8 BOM issues, and require Codex to run the bundled scripts/fixmojibake.py instead of manual or ad-hoc encoding edits.
auto-test-code
A structured process for critically reviewing and testing software code. It records review findings, test plans, commands, results, and supporting files in a project workspace.
git-pr-review
A read-only reviewer for GitHub pull requests, which are proposed code changes submitted for review. It produces an evidence-based report about whether a pull request should be merged.
code-reviewer
A code-review workflow that checks completed work against its requirements or plan before merging. It groups findings by severity and gives each issue a fix and a way to verify it.
boostprompt
Use quando uma necessidade de negócio ou técnica precisar de discovery estruturado em pt-BR e de um prompt de implementação autocontido.
improve-codebase-architecture
Find architecture deepening, terminology, and semantic-symmetry opportunities in a codebase. Use for architecture or refactoring audits, tightly coupled or shallow modules, weak test seams, scattered domain concepts, overloaded names, or sibling workflows whose ownership and transitions drift unexpectedly. Do not use…