Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add promptdriven/pdd --skill pdd-featuregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/promptdriven/pddWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/promptdriven/pdd/pdd-feature)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/promptdriven/pdd/pdd-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/promptdriven/pdd/pdd-feature/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/promptdriven/pdd/pdd-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/promptdriven/pdd/pdd-feature.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00801 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00320 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
pdd-feature scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 31 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PDD feature
Each area is one main chat. Step briefs are in steps/. ? = optional.
- story: understand, visual?, prompt-story → gate: approve
- prompt-pr: check, try? → approve, then gate: pr (PR 1: prompt, Story, tests), then ask
- code: build, verify, formal → gate: pr (PR 2)
Rules
- The main chat coordinates and talks with the person. It does not write code.
- Run each step in a new subagent, never reused, so verify never checks its own code. Give it its full brief at once: the step file and file paths, not the chat history. Then wait for it with one long time-out. Do not send small follow-up messages or use short waits.
- At a gate, show the result, ask the person, and stop. For changes, revise here and ask again.
- Write each link as its full URL (
https://…), never as a linked word. - Before an optional step, ask the person and wait for the answer: "Do you want a visual design step? yes/no". In a run, run
<pdd> workflow askfirst. For a page or a screen, recommend visual: it makes the app map. - At the story gate, give the full paths of the Story files and the plan, and show the plan list. The person can say "make it one Story", "split part 5" or "change Story 5: …". A change request names a Story: redo only that Story and its test file. If a new prompt covers only this issue, say that a bigger "adopt PDD for this module" step can come later. You may offer: "You can also open it now with
pdd try <story>before the check." If visual made an app map, tell the person to runpdd try <story> --new. End with: "Reply 'I approve' here or runpdd workflow approve N, or tell me what to change." - Before PR 1, show one
Runtime checkline per Story with its report link, and the Try links, if any. Ask the person to try it and approve, or ask for changes. pdd opens PR 1 only after the approval. Then show the PR 1 link and ask: "Do you want the code PR now, or stop here and merge PR 1 first? To make the code PR later, runpdd workflow approve N." The code area starts only when the person asks. - If verify or formal finds a failing case, go back to build in a new subagent, at most 2 times. If it still fails, PR 2 opens anyway with "✗ N vectors fail" on top. Say so at the gate.
- A person decides expected values. Never change a test to make it pass.
- Never push, open a PR or merge.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 31 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 8a7656bad8b3
pdd-feature is a skill published in the GitHub repository promptdriven/pdd (920 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 801 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-28.
Other skills, from other repositories
sparc-methodology
SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration.
logic-lens
AI-powered Claude Code skill that performs deep code review using formal logic and reasoning frameworks to detect bugs, anti-patterns, and security risks beyond what linters catch.
knowledge-extension-ecosystem-lsp-code-intelligence
A codebase guide to LSP, the standard protocol behind editor features such as symbol queries, file diagnostics, and language-aware code information.
code-runner
A sandboxed code execution tool that runs short programs without using your computer's files or network. It supports Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Rust, Java, C, C++, Ruby, and PHP.
github-explorer
Explore and summarize popular GitHub projects. Use when the user wants to discover trending GitHub repositories, analyze project details, or get summaries of popular projects.
code-review
Review frontend code for best practices, bugs, and improvements. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code quality, or before committing.