design-review

design-review is a skill for Claude Code from PromptPartner/agentsmith. It costs 61 tokens per session (995 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A checklist for reviewing Facet user-interface components against their design system. It checks design tokens, visual states, accessibility, color contrast, and responsive behavior across screen sizes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when adding or restyling a Facet UI component, or before opening or merging a UI change.
Why use it?
Automated checks can confirm that code builds and passes tests, but they cannot reliably tell whether a component looks and behaves like the rest of the design system. This review catches those visual and interaction mismatches before a change is merged.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Good fit Use it when adding or restyling a Facet UI component, or before opening or merging a UI change.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/promptpartner/agentsmith/design-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add PromptPartner/agentsmith --skill design-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PromptPartner/agentsmith

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for design-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/promptpartner/agentsmith/design-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/promptpartner/agentsmith/design-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/promptpartner/agentsmith/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/promptpartner/agentsmith/design-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 61 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 995 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00061 $0.00995
Opus 5 $0.00030 $0.00498
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00199
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00100

Measured 8d ago against content hash 4f40ade9bc3d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

examples/ui-component-library/.claude/skills/design-review/SKILL.md · 61 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Design Review — Facet UI

verify.sh proves a component builds, types, tests, and passes axe. It cannot prove the component matches the design system — "is this on-system?" is a judgment call, not a grep (see docs/11). This skill is that judgment pass, as a checklist, so a component doesn't ship looking almost-right. It loads only when you're reviewing UI — everyday work doesn't pay for it.

When this fires

You type /design-review, or you've added/restyled a component and are about to open or merge the PR.

Before you start

Open DESIGN.md and keep it beside the diff. Every check below is "does the component agree with DESIGN.md?" — if you're guessing, you haven't read it recently enough.

Checklist

Walk these in order. Stop at the first miss, fix it, restart — an off-system component is not "done."

  1. Tokens, not literals. No raw hex, px font sizes, or magic radii in the component — every value resolves to a token in src/tokens/ that mirrors DESIGN.md (color.primary, radius.md, type.body, space.lg). A literal #5e6ad2 or 13px is a miss even if it looks identical, because the next token change won't reach it.
  2. All states present and on-system. Default, hover, active, :focus-visible, and disabled — each matching DESIGN.md (e.g. a primary button: hover → primary-hover #828fff, focus → a 2px primary-focus ring). A missing state is the most common miss; check every interactive part.
  3. Accessible. Keyboard-operable, correct ARIA role/name, a visible focus ring (never outline: none without an equal replacement), and contrast ≥ 4.5:1 for body text (≥ 3:1 for large / UI). test-storybook's axe pass is necessary but not sufficient — eyeball the focus ring.
  4. Type and spacing scale. Sizes, weights, line-heights, and letter-spacing come from the type scale; padding/gaps come from the spacing scale. No one-off 600 weight where DESIGN.md says 500, no 10px gap outside the 4px grid.
  5. Right surface and elevation. Backgrounds use the surface ladder (canvas → surface-1 → …) and depth is carried by surface + hairline border per DESIGN.md — not an invented drop shadow or a skipped surface level.
  6. Responsive. The component reflows per the breakpoints and holds touch-target minimums (CTAs ≥ 40px, ≥ 44px on touch). Check the smallest supported width, not just desktop.
  7. DESIGN.md moved with the code (R6). If you added a new component pattern or variant, its entry exists in DESIGN.md's components: section in this same PR. If the pattern you needed wasn't in DESIGN.md, it should have been added there first — fix the order, don't paper over it.
  8. Story + test cover the above. The .stories.tsx shows every state (so the a11y/interaction runner and a reviewer both see them); the .test.tsx asserts them. A state with no story is a state no one reviews.

Read the full file on GitHub · 61 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 61 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 4f40ade9bc3d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

design-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository PromptPartner/agentsmith (185 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 995 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.